Dear @AdamGT , I’m very excited about this new Mover & Shakers statistic you’ve introduced. I’m most interested in Photo Views statistics, I would also be interested in Star Photo Views statistics, but since my Star Photo is now a red star, I have nothing to compare with.
So, with regard to the Delta Views, these statistics give us an idea of such data that we previously didn’t have access to. As I said earlier, for me the most important indicator is Average Views/Photo, but even that is not ideal. I said earlier that it is possible to have a high Average Views/Photo score, but at the same time this indicator is an achievement of the past.
Here’s an example. I want to compare my data with that of three Local Guides such as @JustJake , @abermans and @xmen123wood . If we compare our Average Views/Photo, then all three of them have it lower than mine (mine is 49,749, JustJake has 40,389, abermans has 36,996, xmen123wood has 25,790), but if you compare the Delta Views/Photo, then just the opposite, all three have statistics higher than mine (mine is 1,958, JustJake has 2,693, abermans has 3,595, xmen123wood has 4,719). It all goes to show that the contribution of these three great Local Guides in May is doing much better than my contribution. And I need to be very wary
of these three Guides, because in this state of affairs they will eventually overtake me in terms of Average Views/Photo.
Adam, I’m really sorry that out of 358 Local Guides that participate in the Leaderboards, only 45 provided information about their data and participate in the Movers and Shakers Leaderboard. Otherwise, if I compared all the data, I would understand that my affairs are even worse than I think at the moment.