Handle with Care: Merging vs. Permanently Closing vs. Deleting a POI

Introduction Reading various posts on Connect, I’ve realized how often these three options are confused or overlapped. This leads Local Guides to make edits that are not only incorrect but can also damage Google Maps and the legitimate contributions of other Guides. As the saying goes, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”; actions we believe are right can actually cause significant damage if not handled correctly.

I decided to write this post to help you decide which action to take in different scenarios.

A Typical Scenario: Imagine you go for pizza at a newly opened spot. As a proud Local Guide, you take photos and want to leave a review. You check Maps and see the “pizzeria” isn’t there. A great opportunity, right? You add the place, it gets approved, and you post your review and beautiful photos.

Then, someone else visits the same spot and does exactly what you did, only to find that this “Italian restaurant” is missing from Google Maps. So, they add it as well. Eventually, a more experienced Local Guide comes along and finds two entries for the same place, perhaps with slightly different names or categories. What should they do?

Defining the Terms. First, let’s define what we are dealing with:

  • Duplicate Place: A place that physically exists but has been entered into Google Maps more than once. It’s an error that shouldn’t happen, but it does.
  • Permanently Closed: A place that once existed on Google Maps but is no longer active. It likely has photos and reviews testifying to its history. It might have a “Closed” sign, a “We’ve moved” notice, or it might have been replaced by a new business or even demolished.
  • Does Not Exist: This applies to places that should never have been on Google Maps in the first place. These are often added in good faith (we’ve discussed “fire extinguishers” or similar items before) using plausible categories. The most common case is someone adding their private home. As a reference please read Places you can't add to the map - Google Maps Help

The Danger of “Does Not Exist”: Unfortunately, the most common (and wrong) action taken is marking a place as “Does not exist.” This action, once approved, is nearly irreversible and causes massive data loss:

  • To the Business: They lose legitimate reviews and images.
  • To Local Guides: Their contributions vanish or are disconnected.
  • To Google Maps: We lose the historical record of that location.

Choosing the Right Edit

  1. Permanently Closed: This preserves the history. If I want to revisit a place I loved two years ago, seeing it marked as “Permanently Closed” saves me a wasted trip. The info remains visible, but no new contributions can be added.
  2. Duplicate: This is the best option for multiple entries. It merges the contributions of both (or more) POIs, consolidating photos and reviews. This significantly improves the quality of Google Maps.

The “Pro” Strategy: How to Successfully Merge: We’ve all been there: you suggest a “Merge,” and it gets rejected. Why? Usually, it’s not the algorithm’s fault, but because the two entries look too different to a machine.

Take our Italian restaurant example:

  • POI A: “Pizza Da Luigi” (Category: Pizzeria)
  • POI B: “Da Luigi, La Vera Italia” (Category: Italian Restaurant)

To the algorithm, these might look like two different businesses in the same building. The secret to a successful merge is making them identical first. Before suggesting the merge, edit the POIs so they have the exact same name, category, and website. It might take a bit more time and a few preliminary edits, but in my experience, this method has a 100% success rate, even with three or four duplicates.

For a detailed deep dive on this, I highly recommend checking out @MortenCopenhagen 's excellent topic: #LGCTM Tips & Tricks: Merge Workflow

Conclusion: If you have any doubts or questions, feel free to ask! We’re happy to help you set up your edits correctly. Let’s keep Maps clean, but let’s do it with care.

Great post, @ErmesT

Thanks.

You are welcome, @MortenCopenhagen
Recently I was reading some post about merging, and especially one where the author, being the merge rejected, decided to “delete” a place with 21 reviews.
He inspired me to write this topic, with the hope that this will help to have less “irreversible” mistakes.
Many people write here because the place they reviewed has been removed from Maps.
Many times the intention was probably good but, as I said

@ErmesT Great post, thank you so much for including this topic in the discussions.

Here in Canada, this happens a lot, especially with tourist farms (they close in the winter because there are no visitors), and people claim they no longer exist, but they are only temporarily closed.

I myself end up contacting these places sometimes by email to find out if they really no longer exist, and often the team that manages the local information networks doesn’t even know what’s happening.

Therefore, I completely agree that we need to be very careful with the land we want to manage.

Thank you @GasparKaren
In this case the solution, as they are closed for a long time, is to flag them as “permanently closed”, and to re-open them on the correct period of the year.
Unfortunately the owner of the businesses don’t have any idea about the possibility to “claim the business” and them to manage the listing by themselves.
In this way they may help to avoid the delusion of customers that are coming thinking to find an active place
In addition a “permanently closed” POI cannot receive contributions ( I came here and the place doesn’t exists) and can only have a limited amount of edits, protecting the business against inappropriate ones

Thanks for the clear explanation — super helpful! :blush: @ErmesT

I faced a similar issue too — same place showing with 3 different names.I tried merging them, but the edit is still pending.

This is very help tips @ErmesT and thank you!

@ErmesT mir hat die Anleitung von @MortenCopenhagen bezüglich der Zusammenführung von Orten sehr geholfen, kann ich nur empfehlen.

Perfect explanation! @ErmesT
Thanks for sharing.

Excellent post @ErmesT It clearly defines the scenarios between Duplicate listings or ones that doesn’t exist. Thanks for sharing

Nicely elaborated, @ErmesT.
I agree that “Does Not Exist” is always a dangerous choice. Any edits, we have to choose wisely.

Cheers!

An educative post. Thanks for sharing here and I could relate with my contribution. Recently I too faced a similar situation @ErmesT . I visited a chain outlet using Maps, but that branch was closed and some renovation going on. I enquired and found that there’s some other shop is about to come. Then I edited as permanently closed. Really felt that we should be more careful while editing.

@ErmesT Thank you for this insightful post. You have explained it beautifully .

I will surely remember points to ponder before merging the category and not going for ‘Does Not Exist’ marking, unless it is genuinely necessary.
However most importantly I will not venture into stepping into this action until I learn how to go about it. Thank you for sharing important information :white_flower:

@ErmesT This is a great article; it answers exactly why I mentioned some of the examples.:clap:

“The secret to a successful merge is making them identical first”
Grazie @ErmesT a questo non avevo mai pensato. Ottimo suggerimento.
Buone cose

Thank You @ErmesT
Your articles are truly magnificent, and there is always something new to learn from them.

For me, posts from you and other amazing Local Guides like you are as important as a curriculum.
Thank you so much for such a detailed and useful post! :blush:

Thanks for that, @Np45-Nirav .
Have you tried to follow the steps shared by @MortenCopenhagen? FYI, I did the preliminary step by moving the 3 POIs on the same location, but you will have to make the next ones, because we don’t have enough information (e.g. about the correct name) to suggest the edits by ourself

You are welcome, @Erna_LaBeau

Fully agree, @Annaelisa

You are welcome, @NareshDarji

Yes, this was the idea, @Ssiddharth2000 , and I am happy for your confirmation that the post is clear. I am so disappointed when I see a POI removed only because someone acts in the wrong way.

Right, @AjitThite . Unfortunately Does not exist is too easily accepted by Google Maps

Yes, @Gurukrishnapriya , we should “handle with care” the options we have, and choose the right one. Unfortunately many choose the easier one