Celebrating Meet-ups, Shaping Conversations: A Space for Learning and Clarity ⭐

Community-led meet-ups have always been the heart of Local Guides Connect. They bring us together to learn from one another, build meaningful connections, and strengthen local communities across the world. Over time, I’ve seen how consistently the community has focused on organizing meet-ups, and how this collective effort has shaped a strong culture of learning and collaboration.

Along this journey, several valuable resources have been created to guide Local Guides. Posts by Google Moderators, such as How to organize a successful meet-up and How to write a great meet-up recap,” have provided clear and structured direction—not just on hosting meet-ups, but also on documenting them effectively.

At the same time, the community itself has played an equally important role. Contributions like @Kumaarsantosh’s featured post on Suggested Best Practices for Successful Hybrid Meet-ups and his Ghumakkad Gossip session with Connect Moderator Naresh Darji—where meet-ups were discussed in a simple and practical way—show how knowledge continues to evolve through shared experiences. I had the opportunity to attend that session, and it was truly a valuable learning experience.

All of this reflects one important thing: as a community, we are continuously learning, improving, and supporting each other. And when I talk about meet-ups, I see them within the framework of existing community guidelines—where the process and expectations are already well defined.

With this background, I recently shared the Recap of Recaps: February 2026 Community-Led Meetups post. The response was encouraging, and I am grateful for the support and engagement it received. The intention was simple—to celebrate the efforts, participation, and achievements of Local Guides through a data-based presentation.

However, as the discussion unfolded, I noticed something important. Some conversations gradually moved away from the core purpose of the post. In few instances, this even created doubts around the achievements highlighted in the leaderboard—something that was never intended.

This made me reflect on how such posts are perceived, especially by new Local Guides. Many readers go through posts quickly, and when discussions appear mixed or diverted, it can create confusion and reduce engagement with the main content. At the same time, it is important to remember that in the Recap of Recaps series, all meet-ups are analyzed based on defined objectives, and the data is presented exactly as it is available.

Suggestions and new ideas are always welcome—they are, in fact, essential for growth—but they are most effective when shared in a way that builds clarity rather than confusion.

This experience led me to a simple realization: while celebration and discussion are both important, they sometimes need their own space to remain effective.

That is why I am creating this post as a dedicated space—for thoughtful discussions, suggestions, and shared learning around meet-ups. Going forward, the main Recap of Recaps posts will remain focused on celebrating community achievements, while any detailed discussions or suggestions can be brought here. I will be sharing the link to this post in every future series update so that all such conversations can take place in an organized and meaningful way.

In this way, we can maintain a positive and focused space for celebration, while also ensuring that discussions continue to happen—constructively, clearly, and in the right context.

17 Likes

Well thought out @SharmaK ji :blush:

Separating discussion and celebration will make everything easier to understand….:two_hearts:

3 Likes

Congratulations on putting up these fabulous numbers in a tabulated manner, @SharmaK ji :bouquet:

Though if you had taken into consideration the Quarter, Jan-March, the picture would have been quite different and realistic.

One month is too short a time sample to show a trend or a snapshot.

Regarding the good practices that you appreciated, the recap, even when cancelled, I had followed up with them for a dozen or more times to write those lines… it was a very frustrating experience.

Salute to your perseverance and eye for detail in conceiving and compiling the data.

Though Map editing is in the top place entirely due to the Maps Master series, and I hope it will remain so for some time.

Finally, I don’t think the number of participants is a key gap. Solo meetups are equally valuable and recognized if conducted properly and in the true spirit of local guiding.

6 Likes

This is a monthly recap with a leaderboard—I’ll be sharing it every month :blush:

That’s true. However, after a few months, you can combine these monthly recaps to get a clearer trend and better insights :blush:

I agree that solo meetups are equally valuable. However, this post is not meant to compare or debate formats—it simply presents the facts based on the data.

3 Likes

@SharmaK @MortenCopenhagen @AjitThite

If you look from a new local guide’s perspective, especially given that the social media background and experience they come from - like YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, and so on - the entire meetup process is time-consuming and discouraging.

  1. Meetup submission with its quirky types and tags, timeline = 5 working days in advance, banner restrictions in size, and usage of logo. These are bewildering options and a maze to solve.
  2. On the day of the meetup, they must engage and present to the audience.
  3. The meetup recap then becomes a huge burden to complete.

Meetup is an uphill task even for the most seasoned local guides, with its 3 phases listed above.

Maps Master tried to simplify the process and make it more welcoming by using templates and virtual attendees. But recap remains a challenge,

Any trick to solve this will be a huge relief, and we can hope to see many more meetups hosted and conducted ‘with recaps’ in the coming days :partying_face:

2 Likes

@SharmaK. This is a very useful compile. Kudos to you for all the time and effort. There are certain observations which i hope moderators like @TusharSuradkar @MortenCopenhagen @NareshDarji and othersvwpuld take note.

Meetups are not general gathering either virtual or on ground. They need to have specific agenda wrt maps.

Quality versus quantity. In most cases the quality suffers

More often than not the stated agenda is not fulfilled and recap is hogwash. e.g if the recap mentions that certain accessibility features were updated or certain updates made about a meetup location, then you do not need a meetup to do that. One can always update those features anyways

Just because someone is new does not mean a poor quality meet up is organised. New LGs should learn and take advise from others.

Rather than showing how many showed intention of going, a better indicator is how many actually attended.e.g in the meetup i organised 11 showed interest but actually nine turned up on ground. And if i add virtual it becomes 16 or 18. So it better to show split

Hope to get some advice and directions from the moderators because there seems to be a mad rush for numbers esp in India

@NareshDarji . Msybe you can share the practices that existed before

3 Likes

Absolutely @curatorofmemory

But since @SharmaK ji has mentioned already that these are only a tabulation of data and not a place to debate, I will not add anything here :smiley:

Gone are the days when local guides took pride and enjoyed participating in meetups and challenges, and here we are compiling and tabulating numbers that lead to nowhere.

4 Likes

This opens a can of worms @MortenCopenhagen

I would only say that the Maps Master series of meetups was an exception.

We saw an unprecedented participation, both hosting and attendees.

There were dozens of repeat hosts.
100s attended multiple meetups = 100% retention over dozens of meetups :+1:

The correlation with CL selection is unnecessary and baseless, since many of the hosts and attendees did not have any idea about what a CL event is, let alone any hopes for selection.

3 Likes

I completely agree with your words @TusharSuradkar Ji.

What I understand is that people who don’t even host a single meet-up get selected for the CL, which may states that meet-ups are nothing to do with the CL selection.

My another point is, there are places like metro cities where we can get 15-20 meet-up attendees easily but there are remote areas where even 2-3 attendees are hard to find. So I think we shouldn’t tagged a meet-up downgraded or grand & successful on basis of the number of attendees.

3 Likes

Very well said, dear @Shaunak :+1:
Exactly what I wanted to - with pinpoint accuracy.

Once the goals of the meetup are achieved, the number of attendees should not matter at all.

Moreover, how many attendees actually participate actively, more than just attending?
So the numbers are just that - dumb numbers.

3 Likes

Thank you @curatorofmemory for your detailed feedback and for appreciating the effort behind this compilation.

I would like to clarify an important point regarding the purpose of meetups. As highlighted in the post How to organize a successful meet-up by Google Moderator @MoniDi, meetups are not limited to task-based outcomes. In fact, it clearly states:

Local Guides like you host meet-ups to explore an area, try new places, and, most importantly, make great friends! Meet-ups give you the opportunity to informally get together with like-minded people…

Also, the same post mentions:

This clearly indicates that the format and depth of activities can vary widely depending on the host and community.

Coming to this post—this is a data-driven analysis of participation trends, not an evaluation of meetup quality, agenda fulfillment, or individual execution. The focus here is on engagement patterns across countries.

Further, different communities evolve differently, and there is space for both structured and informal meetups. It’s important not to generalize or dismiss diverse approaches that contribute to community growth in different ways.

Dear Vikas ji, I would prefer not to go deeper into debating these points within the community, as such topics are highly subjective and widely discussed across many communities.

I am of the opinion that one should focus on doing their best, and that is what I am striving to do. From my observation, Local Guides—whether new or experienced—are doing a great job and contributing in their own ways.

I have already presented this aspect in my analysis—kindly go through the main post for the same. At the same time, I would like to add that if Connect provides a “Going” feature, then it is also our responsibility to understand and analyze how effectively it reflects actual participation. Studies like the present one help in identifying such gaps and creating better awareness within the community.

Regarding this, I would respectfully say that I have not come across such a pattern in my experience.

I believe in the philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi—“see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.” If something does not align with my perspective, I prefer to share my viewpoint respectfully without imposing it on others.

Being a teacher, I would simply advise everyone to focus on doing their best and utilizing their full potential, rather than paying attention to what others are doing.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

5 Likes

@curatorofmemory I’m not saying much because everyone here is already smart and a master in their own way.

4 Likes

Well said, @curatorofmemory.

I believe the number of low-quality meetups will go down as the Connect Live participants for 2026 have been chosen. And I guess the Googlers hope the lack of engagement (none or few participants and no return participants) will help regulate this.

4 Likes

@TusharSuradkar Thank you for these thoughtful questions.

Regarding your first point, I plan to reflect on this in more detail in a future Connect post, where I can share specific suggestions and approaches to encourage more hosts to write recaps.

For the second point, the intention behind presenting the “leaderboard” alphabetically is to promote inclusivity rather than competition. My focus with the Recap of Recaps series is to strengthen meet-up participation and encourage wider global engagement. A country-wise alphabetical listing makes it easier for readers—especially those not featured prominently—to quickly find their country and feel represented.

Additionally, the key highlights and summaries are already clearly presented in the main post for overall understanding.

Above all, I consciously try to present information in a way that feels inclusive to everyone. Placing higher numbers at the top may emphasize competition, whereas this format ensures broader participation is acknowledged and encouraged.