How to make great edits on Google Maps

[Rodrigo_P]

Sure @LucioV , you can use it as reference . Glad to hear that it's useful

[LStefanoL]

Wishful thinking because if you dare to correct more than just one field at a time your edit goes into the bottomless edit queue and you're lucky if it'll ever gets reviewed (also you have no way of knowing if it gets rejected).

Plus at any time and for obscure reasons some stupid automatic algorithm may decide to ruin your perfectly good location for example by moving it a couple of blocks in any direction.

And if you try to correct it back, back into the bottomless edit queue it goes!

[RonneBD]

Thank you @Rodrigo_P for notice about this issue:-) 🙂 🙂 

[Sariga]

@Rodrigo_P

Hi

Edits should be verified with proof .

The idea is good but google is going back with Spam on Map .

1) A claimed business owner can Change the business name and search key words could be used - No restrictions . Once claimed business changing the name could happen only with a Proof and varification . 

we Kerala Local Guides are having the drive to clear spam . No restriction in using Digital Marketing agency as business names .

2) the Questions are answered by reviewed people . This could be best answered by owner itself 

3) Review reply by business owner is not informed by google to reviewer .

A reply to review must reach the customer . This will keep a good relationship . 

4) new adding places ,  there must be catogory and sub category’s 

5 ) some place a hotel is having a hall , restaurant etc may be marked separate .

6) e-mail address should be shown for verified business ,. So hang out could be initiated. 

[Maria_Camomile]

Привет всем

К сожалению Google map maker уже не работает, а у меня проблема -  адрес компании не изменяется, так как этого дома на картах нет? Оставляла несколько раз отзыв, но ничего. Как-то это можно исправить, так чтобы Гугл добавил здание?

[Vvincent]

Bonjour @Rodrigo_P

Je viens d'effectuer une série  de contribution.

Une des contributions que je n'arrive toujours pas à faire valider par l'algorithme c'est la modification du point  de marquage à chaque fois j'ai le retour en "non appliquée" ou en "attente". 

Avec vous des recommandations et des bonnes  pratiques pour nous garantir la validation ?

[Rodrigo_P]

---

@Vvincent wrote:

Bonjour @Rodrigo_P

Je viens d'effectuer une série  de contribution.

Une des contributions que je n'arrive toujours pas à faire valider par l'algorithme c'est la modification du point  de marquage à chaque fois j'ai le retour en "non appliquée" ou en "attente". 

Avec vous des recommandations et des bonnes  pratiques pour nous garantir la validation ?

---

Hi @Vvincent,

Thank you for your inputs. The recommendations given in the post are a guidance to make good quality edits, therefore by following them the chances that your edits are applied increase greatly. However, as you know , there are many factors that are taken into account by the algorithm to moderate edits made by users , as a result there's no 100% guarantee that your edits will go through even if you follow them .  My advice is to adhere to these good practices and you will see how the quality of your edits is reflected on the amount of them that are approved. 

Regards and Joyeux Noel

[Anonymous]

Generally this is excellent explanation, I believe we are already doing it this way 🙂

[Vvincent]

Merci @Rodrigo_P  pour ces explications. 

Salutations

Bonne fêtes de fin d'années à vous aussi

[jhvvekariya]

Thanks for sharing this edit but you should have added video of that