As a top active Google Maps Local Guide (Happy second year anniversary) , I have put considerable effort into posting high-quality, helpful reviews and uploading engaging photos and videos of places I’ve visited. I, like many Local Guides, have tried to crack the code of what makes a photo likely to be featured by the Maps algorithm.
Lately, I’ve noticed it’s becoming increasingly difficult to get photos featured. However, I’ve observed that any short 2-3 second video I attach to a photo using motion photo mode seems to catch the algorithm’s eye. Even mundane videos are getting prime featuring in the top 3-5 media slots for a place, while my photos languish.
Don’t get me wrong - I understand Google’s motivation to create a richer, more dynamic user experience with featured videos in Maps. But I worry about the trade-offs, especially for users with limited data plans or in roaming mode. Videos can consume significant data, and autoplay is on by default in Maps. With featured videos hogging the top slots, data usage can add up quick, even if someone isn’t actively choosing to view videos.
While I’ll keep experimenting with video, I hope Google finds a way to balance featuring compelling photos and videos while respecting users’ data. For many travelers and Maps users, lean, data-lite photos better serve their needs. Videos may be eye-catching, but they shouldn’t overshadow great photos or penalize users’ data limits.
What do you think about the rise of video in Google Maps?
I’m curious to hear if others share my concerns or can offer tips for getting photos featured in this new video-first paradigm.
Few samples from last weeks - those with the higher views are all videos taken before the photo:



