Photo views as a measure of impact of our Maps contributions

@tony_b , @Rednewt74 ,

“I actually think the opposite, and it has been working for me.” You might have missed my point. I understand that business faces are necessary, it’s specifically what I photograph. BUT, I’m looking at the user experience…from his/her point of view.

I have a 24 year old ‘foodie’ who searches for food similar to everyone else…Searching for “Dinner near me, open now”, then change the pricing filter to $$, and rating to either 4.0 or 4.5 depending on where we are. From there, we read the reviews, and HE looks at the food, and from the way the food looks, and is described, he chooses whether that’s the place he/we should go. When getting there though, if there’s ANY ISSUE at all finding the place, we turn to the photo of the business. BUT, it’s pictures and reviews that got us wanting to go in the first place, not the building appearance. For me, taking a pic of the building and then confirming the location WHILE submitting is what’s worked for me.

I just want to ensure that those interested in going, get to the right place (my making the necessary edits).

With that in mind, has anyone here in LG’s ever considered working together? One does the legwork, and the other does the verification?

  • Steve
1 Like