08-07-2018 11:14 AM
We should add the missing places to help maps users. Only genuine places needs to be approved. Sometimes I feel the map parameters to approve new places are not efficient. What are your thoughts?
08-07-2018 11:45 AM
Hi @Rahulgo8u
The previous discussion on this subject may answer your question. Please read this,
https://www.localguidesconnect.com/t5/General-Discussion/Approved-places/m-p/610987#M170238
May some technical input may be added by Google Moderators.
Vijay Desai.
08-07-2018 11:54 AM
Taken me a year to reach 51, densely populated part of the UK, hard to find a POI not on Maps. When I do add one, seem to have more success in getting it approved if I add just the name, location, photo and telephone. Ive found if I fill in all the information on the first submission it's usually either being reviewed for weeks or declined immediately, I have no idea why. I add the additional information as an edit when new location is approved.
08-07-2018 12:02 PM
Thanks @VijayDesai for your reply. But the discussion is different from here.
08-07-2018 12:09 PM
Hey @Rahulgo8u,
Believe it or not, I have only 5 approved edits out of 15.
08-07-2018 01:46 PM
Thanks for sharing your experience @Muffty. You have added so many places. That's great contribution you have done so far. Kudos to you.
08-07-2018 01:49 PM
Thanks for the reply @GeorgesHR. Even I have just got 6 approved places so far.