Is Two Always Better Than One? The Most Common Photo Violation on Google Maps

Two is better than one,” went a famous 1994 Italian ice cream commercial, spoken in slightly broken English. That catchphrase became viral in my country and is still used today, often to tease those who overdo things or exaggerate.

I chose this old expression to talk about one of the most common—and worst—habits when it comes to posting photos on Google Maps: the double-tap and multiple publishing.

To be clear: I’m talking about people acting in good faith, not those trying to “game the system” by knowingly breaking the rules. However, these behaviors violate Google Maps policies because they add zero information to a listing.

I’ve seen users upload nearly identical images up to 9 times for the same Point of Interest (POI).

  • Who does this help? No one. It only frustrates users who have to scroll through repetitive content to find something useful.
  • What’s the benefit for the contributor? You might get 45 points instead of 5… until you are banned from the program and all your contributions are removed.

What Many Don’t Realize…

Many believe that the only forbidden practice is uploading identical duplicates (the exact same file). In reality, the policies go much further to ensure a high-quality user experience:

  1. Preventing overcrowding: Too many similar images from the same user dilute the helpfulness of the gallery.
  2. Avoiding confusion: Uploading the same image across different locations is misleading.

Let’s look at the most common mistakes and how to avoid them:

1. Identical Duplicates (The “Safety” Upload)

This often happens by accident. You visit a place, take a photo, and then:

  • You add it to your review.
  • You add it to the “Updates” section.
  • Later, Google Maps prompts you via notification to “Add photos of this place,” and you click “Yes” without checking if you’ve already posted them. Result: The same image appears three or four times. Maps doesn’t need “reminders”—one high-quality upload is enough.

2. Pre-post Editing: When “Different” is still “Same”

Some users take a photo, apply a filter or adjust saturation/contrast, and then upload both versions because they look “different.”

Warning: Not only is this redundant, but excessive editing (heavy filters or unrealistic HDR) can also violate the policy of “representing reality.” If you edit, choose your favorite version and upload only that one.

3. Redundant Images (The “Burst Mode” Trap)

Many people think that as long as the shots are slightly different, they are allowed. This is a myth. Maps defines these as "redundant" photos.

4. Duplicates Across Locations (The Mall Example)

Look at this image: an exterior shot of a Mall showing the signs of six different stores inside.

Many think uploading this same photo to all seven listings (the Mall + the 6 stores) is helpful. It is not. It is a violation. A photo of the outside of a building doesn’t help someone trying to see the inside of a specific boutique. If you want to link them correctly, use the “Located Within” feature instead.


Rule #1: Think Like a User

The policies are there for a reason, but the golden rule is simple: Is my contribution truly useful? If you were looking for a restaurant, would you want to see 10 nearly identical photos of the same chair? Probably not.

Check out this great post on how useful our contributions really are for more perspective.

The Official Policies:

“We do not allow the posting of repetitive content on Google Maps because it dilutes useful information… This includes posting the same content multiple times either from the same account or multiple accounts.” — Google Contribution Policy

Remember: Dark, blurry, and redundant photos will be removed. Local Guides who duplicate photos across locations or post images that infringe on copyrights will be removed from the program.


In this topic, we are only covering photos posted without realizing they violate the rules. For a discussion on “stolen” photos and copyright, click here.

Do you have any questions or need clarification? Let’s discuss it in the comments below!

“Now, I’d love to hear from you! Do you find it hard to hit ‘delete’ on those similar shots before uploading, or are you a ‘one-shot’ perfectionist? Have you ever noticed your photo views staying at zero and wondered if redundancy was the cause? Let’s talk about it in the comments! :backhand_index_pointing_down:

@ErmesT ধন্যবাদ শেয়ার করা জন্য ভাই। গুগল ম্যাপে ছবি শেয়ার করার আগে এই পোস্টটি একবার পড়ে নেওয়া উচিত। এতে করে অপ্রাসঙ্গিক ছবি বিশেষ করে ডুপ্লিকেট ছবি বাদ দেওয়ার ক্ষেত্রে অনেক সহায়ক হবে।

[আন্তর্জাতিক মাতৃভাষা দিবসের মাসে লোকাল গাইডস অবদানে নিজের মাতৃভাষা ব্যবহার করি]

Wow :astonished_face:. That’s useful information @ErmesT & I will definitely keep it while contributing.

I have some doubts.

  1. If I have two store front photos of same business (one taken in morning & other at night). Is it okay to upload both or one is enough?
  2. Imagine I uploaded a store front photo of a local business 1 year ago & nothing much changed but I got a good photo with good lighting now. Should I delete the old one & upload the new one?
  3. Do various angle store front photos of a business considered as duplicates?

This is a huge problem. I typically have 3 or 4 versions of the same image in my Photos folder from having to save after various edits. I’ll upload the single “good” ones from each, but Google comes back and prompts me to upload 15 duplicates! I know that it’s an issue, so I don’t make that mistake, but a casual user likely wouldn’t think twice. OR they weren’t even taking photos for the sake of Map contributions, yet they’re still prompted to post all of them.

Even worse: the casual user is convinced “It cannot be wrong, if Google suggests to upload those photos!” And unless frequently watching My Contributions, they are not even aware of any duplicates.

@Rahul001, I would ask myself does either photo (i.e. night versus day resp. one angle versus the other) provide som additional information compared to the other? If each of the pair shows something the other doesn’t, then its worth showing, otherwise not.

Same, as I said above: If both have some unique information, keep the old one, but if only the lighting is better now, delete the old one and upload the new.

By deleting photos, you might loose some views, but views don’t buy you anything anyway. For the points, it is a zero game, so at the end you need to decide, if you brought some advantage to other users and just a nicer photo, because of better light, might not be much.

Great post @ErmesT!! Always thought of this and try to apply the magic rule “think as another user and what you would like to see to find it useful”. I actually spend some time in some places flagging posts or pictures that are either clearly out of topic or redundant or similar but of really bad quality. Funnily enough Google disregards my “advice” and decide pics are OK most of the time. It always bugs me that maps is so quick in removing some of my legit pics or posts but when I clearly see things violating the rules or clearly off topic or bad quality pics and let the system know I get ignored and a message saying “the system checked and determined nothing was wrong with the content”.

Ce post est très éducatif chez @ErmesT et merci encore de nous avoir rappelé notre quotidien qui nous échappe parfois.

Avec la suggestion de Google Photos, tellement ça dérange parfois et par erreur on ajoute, pourtant on a déjà posté.

Sportivement, nous devrions beaucoup passer et contrôler nos contributions une fois posté sur Maps.

Cher @glosings0n pour notre prochain Meetup où nous allons parlé des astuces Photos et Avis à poster sur Maps, vous pouvez trouver quelques points intéressants dans ce posts.

Thanks @ErmesT , this is a very excellent post.
I completely agree with you that this should not happen. I also do not do this myself. I never rely on Google Maps suggestions. I always select and upload my own photos manually. Most of the time, my response to Google Maps suggestions is “skip”.
However, I have one question for you. I have heard about this, but maybe it is just a myth.
If in the past we made mistakes like uploading similar or low quality photos, and now we sit down to remove them, can the Google Maps AI filter become active? Could this put the account at risk?
Or if those mistakes were made 7 or 8 years ago, is it better not to touch them?

Toto je veľmi užitočná pripomienka pre všetkých v komunite @ErmesT Často vidím, ako ľudia nahrávajú desať takmer identických záberov toho istého taniera s jedlom v domnení, že sú mimoriadne nápomocní, ale v skutočnosti sa kvôli tomu v galérii horšie orientuje. Tvoje vysvetlenie, prečo sú tieto fotky označené ako „Nepoužité“ (Not Applied), je veľmi jasné. Naozaj ide o kvalitu nad kvantitou, ak chceme, aby Mapy Google zostali užitočné pre všetkých. Vďaka za zdieľanie týchto skvelých tipov!

Thanks for this guide @ErmesT. I don’t post a large number of photos per POI, but I do have some that are stuck at zero. Now I have a fresh reason to go back and investigate.

Thank you for sharing your knowledge in this very informative article @ErmesT

Excellent post @ErmesT to explain the root cause of redundant photos and how best to avoid uploading duplicates.
For me, even though I’m not a perfectionist, but I believe in one shot photos, I would rather edit them using Photos editor tool and upload on Maps. The only thing I wish to do more is to check my photos which have 0 views and try to find if they’re hidden.
Thanks once again for your insights.

Un peu comme si le Ciel communiqué hein :smiley:

Ça va beaucoup m’aider ce poste et conduire ce que j’avais déjà prévu avec celui-ci pour faire une session complètement bénéfique.

Merci cher @ErmesT pour ce magnifique explication de ces erreurs courantes… ça m’aidera beaucoup pour ma session ici: [Virtual] Democratic Republic of the Congo, February 22, #LocalGuides11 | REBUILD COMMUNITY - Team DRC, Professional Strategies for High-Impact Reviews and Photos on Google Maps. Ep8

:folded_hands:t5:

That’s very useful tips @ErmesT :heart_eyes: . Thank for sharing these :folded_hands:

Grazie @ShafiulB :pray:
Si, credo che questo sia un post che molti dovrebbero leggere, ed è per questo che ho voluto scriverlo. Non sono cose nuove, e in molti le conosciamo già, ma ripeterle non fa mai male

Grazie @Rahul001
Rispondo in Italiano per celebrare il mese dedicato alla madrelingua

Ho visto che @WilfriedB ha già risposto alla tua domanda. Grazie. Concordo con lui.
Come ho detto molte volte credo che il giudizio sia soprattutto una questione di buon senso: Questa immagine aumenta le informazioni sul luogo? Ad esempio la doppia foto giorno/notte può avere senso, se integra le informazioni. Ad esempio: di notte l’area di fronte al negozio è abbastanza illuminata? Al giorno d’oggi molti si preoccupano della sicurezza, e l’illuminazione gioca un ruolo importante.
Qui sotto due versioni con e senza illuminazione di uno stesso negozio, fotografate a 4 mesi di distanza. Secondo te averle entrambe può aiutare?

Foto diverse non sono mai considerate duplicate. La domanda è: sono ridondanti? Ovviamente questo dipende dal contenuto delle due immagini.

Queste due immagine aumentano le informazioni del luogo?

Esatto, @JustJake , @WilfriedB
Questa è una situazione che cerco di portare all’attenzione di Google ogni volta che ho la possibilità di incontrare di persona, a partire dal 2017, qualcuno del team di Google Maps.
Dal 2017 a oggi la tecnologia è molto cambiata, per cui credo che in questo momento esiste la tecnologia per poter evitare questi “suggerimenti” che causano contributi inappropriati (incluso il suggerimento di caricare le nostre immagini in luoghi “sbagliati”).
In effetti questo topic fa parte del lavoro preparatorio per un altro Topic da indirizzare all’attenzione di Google Maps, in cui evidenziare come qualche miglioramento tecnico potrebbe evitare duplicati e ridondanza non intenzionali

Correct @ErmesT, common sense is the most important point here, but there is something else: Awareness!

How many users really watch My Contributions frequently and are very well aware, how many and which photo or video they posted to each place? If we post a photo today and a very similar one months or even years later, who really does remember?