Ideas + Reasons for Posting Videos to Google Maps

A question that surfaces consistently on our Connect forum is around the integration of videos into our Google Maps content. When should we choose to upload a video to Google Maps? When wouldn’t a photo suffice? How can we determine opportunities where we can film more videos? :thinking:

Untitled.gif

While the saying goes, a photo is worth a thousand words, a video can provide more depth and immersion into the place of interest that you are filming at.

The tutorial video below that I created goes over reasons to record and upload a video of a place of interest to Maps. This is accompanied by examples of real-life clips that I’ve added to Google Maps. My hope is that this helps fellow Local Guides get ideas and inspiration for adding videos. :blue_heart: :green_heart:

A summary of the video as follows:

Here are 6 reasons for why I will record and post a video of a place of interest.

1. Movement/Sounds

A photo captures a moment, and it is fixed and still without any sound.

Being able to hear the place adds an extra sensory layer. For example, is the spot loud and crowded? Is there fun music playing? Also, if there is a moving object at the location such as a fountain or a waterfall, a video will allow viewers to see how it moves. Fast, slow, or bubbling, etc…

2. Showcase of ambience

Videos allow guides to set the tone of the location by immersing the viewer in a 3D sensory experience. The intensity of the lighting and colors around build the ambience- happy or sad, playful or serious… What the viewer simultaneously hears through video- scary tones or joyful laughter- further sets the scene.

3. Perspective of size and surroundings

A photo sometimes can’t do justice to convey the size or height of something. A video that pans out can show how expansive a place is as well as any surrounding features. A video that pans up can show how tall a building is, whereas a video that pans down allows us to see how high up a place is.

4. Overview of elements and amenities

While a photo only captures one spot, what if there’s a lot of different elements in a location, such as a gym? With a video, you can move the camera to capture all those elements in one convenient medium.

5. 360 views

360 videos created by you standing in the middle of a location and filming in a circular motion adds on to the immersiveness. The viewer can imagine themselves standing in the location and can know what they will see at all sides of them.

6. Nature scenery

Videos additionally help capture the beauty of nature parks by allowing us to see how the environment sounds and interacts. For example, we can hear the animals in the background and see how the wind, sun, and clouds come together with the landscape to form a perfect outdoors location to visit.

To learn more about other frequently asked questions of videos, you can visit this Q&A post with @MasaWithMaps .

(Edit: Food and drink is another popular category for filming videos for Google Maps, as brought up by @TravellerG and @tony_b . Much appreciated friends! To read more about food and drink video tips & tricks- you can view the tutorial video and article here.) :couple_with_heart_woman_man:

39 Likes

Normally, I don’t tag others to avoid pestering you guys :wink: , but as videos are a hot topic and some of you have written to ask or discuss either via comments, email, or messaging- I wanted to make sure to include you. :blue_heart: :green_heart:

@TravellerG and @Rednewt74 : We were discussing videos on the last post of AI preferences for video orientation, so tagging you here friends on this resource.

@MortenCopenhagen : Earlier this year, we connected on both being passionate on the topic of educating on videos. For now, this is the resource I’ve created more so to share ideas to inspire Guides for when to post videos.

@AdamGT and @TerryPG : Videos were a hot topic in our messaging group in January, remember that? :wink: Seeing as how those in our group wanted to see ideas for how to get started also inspired me to create this tutorial.

5 Likes

@AZ_2021 ,

Really solid ideas and suggestions. I can see where 3, 4, and 6 would work pretty well, but I am sceptical about 1, 2 and 5.Phone mics and speakers just are that good. When the source is very far away from the mic it gets muddy quickly. In traditional video settings most people tend to think the sound is more important than the video. I think if you were going to really dive into this you want to try an external mic and at least a handle if not a gimbal for smoother shots. I’m trying to get past my initial doubts and my difficulties in shooting could handle video; sorry if I sound negative. I Just don’t think it’s a great idea, but if it’s the future I will find a way to embrace it

Your tutorial is great, by the way, and your thoughts are even better!

4 Likes

@AZ_2021

Thank you for posting this feature up…it has just confirmed why I was going to upload more videos

2 Likes

Hi friends, @AZ_2021 , @Rednewt74 & @MortenCopenhagen ,

I fully agree with you in your views… All the six reasons are very important…

But, as a traveller, I suggest you to kindly add FOOD/BEVERAGES & DRINKS… TV adds are the best examples… Food Videos can do miracles…

(travelling, hence details later)

3 Likes

Traveling to Friday…

Still, shall try to add an example of FOOD Videos…

Sorry for the delay…

@AZ_2021 @Rednewt74

1 Like

Sample video

I shot and made this video today. I did a split screen with the original video on the left and a stabilized version on the right. I used capcut to do the editing. Not counting the split screen part it probably took about 3 minutes. What’s nice about dropping your video into capcut is that you can trim a bad beginning or end, adjust the lighting or color, stabilize it, and upload it directly to Google photos. Cap cut is made by tick tock and I’m not crazy about that. the tutorial videos are not that great either. If People are interested I probably could make a tutorial focused on local guide needs.

@TravellerG ??

@AZ_2021 ??

Do you think the Stabilization is much better? Worth the effort?

3 Likes

Awesome video @AZ_2021 my good friend, you are a genius

3 Likes

Since I posted the split screen stabilized comparison, I’ve looked around more in the video menus on my pixel 7 Pro. It does have built-in stabilization for heavy movement (walking or running) and for a cinematic pan as they call it. Does anyone know if other phones have these options? I’ll be testing these out.

Caption: a screenshot of the pixel 7 Pro video menu showing stabilization options.

3 Likes

Love to hear how think alike @DshottDennis :couple_with_heart_woman_man:

1 Like

Great idea @TravellerG

Love your kind support.

I will see if I can add more examples of food videos. :slightly_smiling_face: It’s been a bit of a busy few weeks, but I will definitely add that to my bucket list of things to do. :wink:

@Rednewt74 No worries my friend. I do appreciate all thoughts and feedback, and love to hear how you think! :two_hearts: That would be nice if there was a way to improve the sound on videos, such as a more professional external mic. Nice find too for the video stabilization tool. I didn’t know that existed. Your CapCut video shows how it makes a huge difference- very neat tool and short tutorial. Thank you for showing us those tips! I can see how if a Guide focuses on quality over quantity, they can take time to edit each video to ensure it is a better viewing experience. Amazing ideas. :couple_with_heart_woman_man:

2 Likes

Thank you @TerryPG

You are always so supportive and kind. :sparkling_heart:

2 Likes

A nice one @AZ_2021 , especially so for someone like me who, not for lack of desire or interest but time, has not added any videos to Map. Your post has inspired me so I must have a go.

ps: I noted that your video examples were a mix of portrait (vertical) and landscape (horizontal) but you didn’t make any comment about this aspect of taking videos. I have to add that of all your examples I myself seemed to enjoy the landscape videos more (eg: the video of the museum) and to my mind, your example of the playground in landscape mode would have better allowed for visualization of how the elements of that playground connect together as well as its size. I also think that landscape would have improved the immersiveness 360 of the city. I’d really be interested to hear the views of others on this.

4 Likes

This is fantastic! Thank you so much for doing this!

3 Likes

@AdamGT ,

I really agree with you. 16: 9 video pans are so much more effective than 9:16 pans, at least for landscapes and storefronts. The vertical image feels like you’ve zoomed in too far. You have to go so slow to allow the viewer to take everything in before it’s gone. The Pixel 7 pro cinematic pan mode reduces your pan speed by almost 50%. Which means your 15 sec pan will be 30 sec long.

I do think that with food and some other subjects the vertical format will work fine.

4 Likes

I’d like to know if anyone has a video that has gotten >10,000 views? If so please share a link to it.

I was going to say that none of my 22 videos have gotten over 500 views. Then I decided I should do a fact check. and found one from the middle of last month that in fact has 10,920 views. I’m truly shocked. Salt City Coffee It is a 16: 9 ratio photo montage video, starts off with the sign, then hours, then various interior shots. It is actually the #2 “photo” in their photo gallery. Notice the thumbnail view.- think that has something to do with its placement in the gallery

I really wish there was a way to see just your videos in Maps.

So if you have had successful video posts, please share links so we can learn from them.

3 Likes

Definitely the higher quality the audio, the better, for sure! However, even with the phone mics these days, that can be sufficient. Just hearing ambiance does come up a lot in user feedback - it helps give them a better idea of what the space is like. Everything helps, and sometimes hear that having less that perfect quality conveys authenticity. If it’s “too perfect”, then viewers in Maps sometimes feel like it was professionally produced, and is therefore less representative of what the place is really like.

5 Likes

Hello, dear Googler friend, @MasaWithMaps ,

Yes, your points are interesting… Of course, usually, the content of audio will be the discussions of the family, if it is a restaurant.

Well, over a period of time, there should be a lot more of contributors for video in portrait mode.

Thanks for your kind response and support.

Regards with greetings from Bangalore, India

TG

PS:

I’m tagging my friend @AZ_2021 to read these comments.

Best wishes

:pray:

3 Likes

@TravellerG ,

I appreciate your comment about family conversations. And it made me think of a second privacy concern about videos; the accidental recording of private conversations, names, phone numbers, etc.

My first concern is when someone walks into your video and their face is recognizable. Blurring a moving object is more complicated than blurring a face in a photo. Same issue when panning across cars.

3 Likes

Great discussion here @AZ_2021 and love your video! I wanted to do a similar post but lost track of time so I’ll just add the stuff that I wanted to post as comment to this post. That’ll just help keep the discussion consistent as well.

Firstly, I’ve been adding videos fairly consistently since the Google Maps team mentioned that they were going to give it a bump in prominence. And my videos are 99% of the time taken in portrait mode (as suggested by the team) … and that’s about all the stuff that I’ve done “correctly” because I almost always record long videos (it turns out from @MasaWithMaps 's Q&A post that 4 seconds is about the average viewing time!) and I also use the Cinematic Pan mode (I was on the Pixel 6 Pro before and now on the Pixel 7 Pro), which is great for stabilizing your shots but it strips out the audio!

As @Rednewt74 had pointed out, shooting in Cinematic Pan mode basically takes a X seconds recording and outputs a 2X seconds recording, so in reality, my pan is only 15 seconds long to get a 30 seconds long video. To me, I prefer this style of video because I feel that panning in portrait mode needs to be slower (more stabilized) otherwise things just go by way too quickly! Hence, I’m struggling with the concept of shooting in standard mode (to be able to catch the audio for that all important environment/ambiance feel) and keeping it to 4-10 seconds long. It just feels too rushed for a panning video of a venue. For food shots, that’s probably fine.

With regards to video view counts above 10k, I am also surprised to find some (I rarely check my views :sweat_smile: ) and I’ll share them as links below:

They were all uploaded between 2-3 months ago (the list above is in publishing order with the top item being the most recent upload).

Some thoughts/observations of mine:

  • Portrait videos fill the screen in full so, IMHO, looks best. Landscape is scaled to fit and requires user to rotate phone.
  • I like the slow-mo feel of my videos. They look… cinematic :sweat_smile: but I can appreciate that it may be too slow and folks will just swipe away.
  • I would love to add audio but because my videos are slowed down, the audio would just end up distorted.
  • Videos on Google Maps have their audio muted by default which I can understand the reasoning for that. It works in my favour because I don’t have audio in my videos anyway but does seem odd if the general consensus is that viewers want to hear the audio (it could be quite annoying perhaps to always have to unmute every video I watch on Maps).
  • I have uploaded lots of videos and I don’t see any pattern to which works better than others. The only guess I have for high view counts is down to Google Map’s algorithm for video promotion (pushing the videos up the list of user contributions). I have noticed that if I add a lot of videos for a single POI, I tend to have low view counts across of the videos. If I add just 1-2 videos, they tend to perform better.
  • I prefer to not have to edit my videos as it can get quite time consuming
  • I also prefer to not see edited videos especially those with added text, emoji etc as I find those distracting (perhaps more suitable for other platforms but not really for Maps). As Masa mentioned, I feel like it loses its authenticity.

I actually took some clips a while back (after Masa’s post came out) to compare shooting videos in standard mode vs the Cinematic Pan mode and wanted feedback from the community. I deliberately kept the recording time short (around 4 seconds for standard and 8 second for the Cinematic Pan). I still have them on the phone and will need to transfer them to YouTube to make them viewable by all so I’ll work on that later.

5 Likes