How could Google make drawing roads more engaging and motivating? What do you think?

Hello, fellow road contributors, TRAC and TORM participants,

@PrasadVR and @MortenCopenhagen met in Visakhapatnam on December 10, 2025, to exchange road drawing experiences and discuss how this can become a more pleasant experience.

We feel Google Maps has been incredibly successful in encouraging users to post photos and reviews, but more roads around the world still need to be found and added to Google Maps. Creating Road Mapper was clearly a step in the right direction, but there are still some significant challenges to address.

So in this post, we are presenting a series of 14 potential improvements to drawing roads. We hope our fellow road nerds will help prioritize these from a road contributor’s point of view. You can do so by grading each of the 14 suggestions below.

So, in this post, we want you, as an active road contributor, to prioritize each of the 14 proposals below. We respectfully request that Local Guides with fewer than 100 approved roads on Google Maps not vote in this survey.

Please avoid giving the same grade repeatedly. Some suggestions must be more important than others :wink:

1: Better guidance

We request more detailed guidance from Google on how best to add and edit roads to ensure a higher approval rate. Currently, we have to rely on guessing and learning by doing, which is hampered by delayed approvals, low approval rates, and difficulties in tracking our road edits. The TRAC community would be happy to collaborate on this. Sample clarifications needed include:
How to deal with trees and shadows over roads.
Clarification on optimal road length and number of turns in one road edit.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

2. Faster approvals

We see too many road edits expire after 90 days and much longer delays during road drawing campaigns. We also saw delays during the latest Road Mapper campaign. We request the necessary resources be allocated to ensure a faster turnaround on all road edits. Delayed approvals interfere with our ability to learn from the outcome of our edits. Motivation depends a lot on this. Both for campaign organizers and the participants.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

3. Higher approval rates

In Road Mapper the approval rates are close to 100 percent. In Google Maps the situation is a lot worse. Most road editors achieve approval rates as low as 5%, whereas highly experienced road editors may get 50-60% approval. To attain a high approval rate, we need to avoid drawing roads under trees and shadows, despite the roads being obviously there. We request that the AI approving roads be better trained and/or experienced road editors be given more trust.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

4. Shortcut to open the Road Editor more quickly

It takes too many clicks to open the Road Editor on computers - also when using right-click followed Report a data problem.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

5. Retain focus after submitting a road edit

When you open the Road Editor and need to move far from the starting position to find a missing road, the focus will shift back to the starting position. We request the focus not jump back so we can continue adding roads in the newly found area.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

6. Pending roads should also be shown on mobile devices.

We highly appreciate the feature showing pending roads on computers. We wish this could be extended to the mobile platform.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

7. Retain zoom level and map excerpt

When opening the road editor, the zoom level and location often shift, making it unnecessarily cumbersome to refind the exact place to suggest a road edit.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

8: Email notification should again contain a link to where the roads were drawn

Email notifications of approved road edits now contain a link to our list of all kinds of edits rather than a Maps link to the relevant place where the road was drawn. This hinders our options to study and learn from our road efforts.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

9: Better filtering of edits to show pending and approved road edits

Dedicated road contributors regret the decision to no longer have approved road edits jump to the top of our edit contribution lists. But it would be even better if we could have a tool to filter and show both pending and approved road edits. This would hugely improve our learning opportunities. It does not necessarily need to be a feature built into Google Maps. A separate API-based service would work as well.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

10. Participation of a road team representative in bimonthly virtual meetings with volunteer road contributors

We request virtual bi-monthly participation from someone on the team to informally interact with us to ensure our issues are heard and guidance can be shared where solutions already exist. Listening to users is always good practice. A physical meet-up could also serve as a huge motivator, attract more road contributors, and serve as a thank you to productive volunteers. The event programming could be masterfully focused compared to Connect Live, where all kinds of topics are discussed.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

11. More live contribution metrics related to roads

In the monthly and weekly praise emails, stats related to roads could be included. We would love to also see metrics on pending roads, please. Could we have a Road Mapper-style streak graph for roads drawn in Google Maps?

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

12. More Connect appraisal to Road contributors

Could the existing Road Mapping Champion badge be developed into a standard 3-level badge like for other Connect badges? We would also like clarification on the current criteria for awarding the “Road Mapping Champion” badge on Connect.

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

13. Longer timeout for pending road edits

Could the timeout for pending roads, now at 3 months, be extended to 12 months? This is less relevant if the approval times are fixed (see proposal #2)

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

14. Local Guides points for Road Mapper contributions

Could completed Road Mapper challenges be added under Approved roads on the detailed contribution stats page and consequently LG points given?

On a scale from 1 to 10, please indicate how urgent you find the above proposal. 10 being super important.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0 voters

We hope to discuss these proposals on tomorrows TRAC virtual meeting, so we ould approciate you taking the time to read and vote on these proposals prior to the virtual meet-up.

Thanks so much.

Prasad and Morten

43 Likes

RESERVED for updates

1 Like

Thank @MortenCopenhagen

I voted in the poll.

However, in my opinion, most of the requests aren’t urgent, and even some aren’t good at this moment. There could be more urgent things, such as the ability to define more properties of a road, and especially road priority and level (bridge, surface, underpass, etc).

9 Likes

Great.

Please elaborate and formulate your suggestions clearly with a heading a short explanation in the style of the 14 suggestion.

5 Likes

Hello @MortenCopenhagen

It’s done now. I have casted my votes. I agree with @Amiran as well.

Like I discussed with you earlier on. There is alot of information contained in there for now. We might be better going step by step.

Moreover the most pressing thing to us now is our approval rate and tips on how to be a proper road editor. Enough of guessing and trial and errors from fellow local guides etc.

Well this could be a good start to everything we want.

Happy guiding.
Cheers

9 Likes

Thank you for your valuable feedback and continued dedication to improving the accuracy of Google Maps road data. I have formally structured your additional observations and suggestions regarding the prioritization of road edits and concerns about potential mapping misuse.

​1. Prioritizing Accuracy Over Volume in Road Editing

​A fundamental principle for road data quality should be the emphasis on accuracy over the sheer quantity of edits.

  • ​Suggestion: We recommend prioritizing the review and correction of existing road geometry, connectivity, and attributes, particularly in areas where discrepancies have been reported or observed. Focusing resources on high-impact corrections will ensure the map remains a reliable navigational tool.
  • ​Rationale: An inaccurate but numerous map is less useful and potentially detrimental to navigation than a smaller, yet highly accurate, one. High data quality is paramount for user trust and safety.

​2. Addressing Potential Misuse of Road Mapping for Commercial Gain

​We must acknowledge and investigate the observation that certain entities, including industry groups and developers, may be attempting to improperly influence road mapping for commercial or strategic advantage.

  • ​Observation: There is a discernible pattern where roads are potentially being drawn or edited with the intention of artificially directing or increasing traffic flow to specific, planned developments or commercially owned areas. This practice undermines the objective and authoritative nature of the map.
  • ​Suggestion for Prioritization: The road editing review process should be enhanced to include checks for:
    • ​Commercial Interest Conflicts: A mechanism to flag and scrutinize proposed road additions or significant edits that disproportionately benefit a single, clearly identifiable commercial or residential developer’s property.
    • ​On-the-Ground Verification (OGV): Increased reliance on recent satellite imagery, Street View, and potentially community-driven reports to verify that a mapped road physically exists and serves a genuine public purpose before an edit is finalized.
3 Likes

Hey @MortenCopenhagen it’s great to see you with @PrasadVR :heart_eyes:
I suggest to visit more cities there, hope you will enjoy your stay there :blush:

4 Likes

Really very important poll for road mappers perticularly.
Nice to see you in India and meeting our champ, @MortenCopenhagen @PrasadVR

Cheers!

4 Likes

Thanks for the initiative, @MortenCopenhagen and @PrasadVR

Based on my experience, there are several things that I want to suggest:

  1. Choices to change the type of road. Some roads actually are correctly drawn, but when I checked through the navigation, cars were directed through narrow roads.
  2. Choice to delete partial part of the roads that are incorrectly drawn.
  3. Some features on Road Mapper can be brought into map editing, especially about selecting and moving parts of the road to the right places. I’ve found that sometimes the actual road and the map road are approximately 100-200 meters apart.

As mentioned by @Amiran, it is important to define the bridges and underpasses. I have experience about editing a small road under the toll road (underpass). I can’t move the small road, because of the toll road is fixed and can’t be edited. Deleting and redrawn the road may be the solution, but is there any better solution about this. I hope that Google can also give clearer rules about editing and adding roads. For example, are the approvals of both editing and adding road will be granted by 15 points or there are possibilities that editing the name or the shape of the road will be given only 5 points. But, in my opinion, as mentioned by @SholaIB, the most important thing to be discussed is the approval rate.

4 Likes

Thank you @MortenCopenhagen. I am happy to see you with @PrasadVR. If you plan to visit Delhi or Jaipur, please let me know — I would love to meet you. I have filled the survey except for question no. 5, as it was not clear to me what exactly I am supposed to rate. I will call Prasad ji and consult regarding it.

2 Likes

The real problem with the approval rates is not rejections, but a large number of edits being left to sit unchecked and die after 90 days. We never get to discover if they were good edits or not.

6 Likes

Hello, dear friend @MortenCopenhagen Ji…
Are you still in India? Where are you? Are you planning a visit to Bangalore? I request you to be our guest at our home, please.

Yes, dear @PrasadVR …I have completed my voting.
Highly appreciate you both for this initiative which is very important; hope, Google will take sufficient care to give us helping hand…

Of course, there are suggestions and improvements… but, if this mission has some impact, we can update these later.

Thanks for your dedication to bring this out.
Regards with greetings
:handshake::bouquet::folded_hands:

2 Likes

Welcome to India @MortenCopenhagen It’s great to see you and @PrasadVR meeting and discussing all things about adding roads. I have voted on the poll questions.

2 Likes

Wow, it’s great to see you both in the same frame, @MortenCopenhagen and @PrasadVR, framing these much-needed proposals!. :folded_hands:

Thank you for putting together such a well-thought list of 14 points. It truly covers the major challenges faced by active road contributors.

I have graded all the 14 proposals. :+1::blush:

I’m not sure if I will be able to join tomorrow’s TRAC meet-up as I have a conflict with my work meetings, but I will try my best to adjust my schedule! :handshake:

2 Likes

Hi @IndianRavi

I have been trying to understand this issue:

I don’t think I have ever come across this, so my immediate reaction is to believe this is a minor problem. But of cause I could be wrong. I trust you are familiar with the geo partnership program where municipalities and developers can circumvent the normal approval process and get their trusted data displayed on Google Maps. 100% automatic and immediate approvals.

Where this system is in use there is a pre-approval process of the partners so all their new roads and road names thereafter get automatically approved.

I doubt developers would risk their partnership with Google Maps as you suggested.

1 Like

Regarding:

I believe the current setup where very short road segments are more likely to get approved is favoring quantity over quality.

1 Like

Hi @TravellerG

Thank you so much for your kind invitation, but my schedule is already fully filled. I’m sorry. Please accept my apologies.

2 Likes

Thanks for your Reply @MortenCopenhagen but I see lots of road are drawn in either field or near to developing society it may be drawn purpously or may pre approved by local authorities as you said above . But here my concern is to Google Maps trust is more important for users, while Navigation people are developing mindset that Google Maps is not Showing accurate information due to these bad or misleading roads.So I more focus on improving Quality over quantity so many video are making fun of Google Maps for incorrectly Drawn road on their platform but still people have more trust in Google Maps because of the trust and determination to show correct information to their users. No I don’t know much about Geo Partnership program with Google Map with local authority.And I am not Confident that adding Road for benifit for individual are in going to practise because I don’t have any poof so I can only say through my editing experience or my observations .my duty is over after sharing those suggestions because I don’t have additional access or resource to catch them and report them .

1 Like

I’ve casted my votes

1 Like

I totally agree with you

1 Like