Accessibility: Cost or Investment for the Future?

This is a conversation I’ve had many times over the years, whenever I’ve had the chance to speak with businesses or public administrations: “Is implementing accessibility a cost or an opportunity for profit?”

The immediate answer is often that accessibility is a cost—an obligation to follow rules and implement structures. Ramps to build, bathrooms to enlarge, just to give a few basic examples. This is usually the starting point of every conversation, and it stems from a fairly simple concept: who is accessibility for? Many believe that implementing accessibility only serves a limited category of people: those in wheelchairs, who are mostly elderly. Therefore, they are seen as few, and often less inclined to leave their homes.

In reality, this is a narrow perspective, but as I mentioned, it is the starting point from which we can begin to explain that no, that’s not the case.

I believe the first thing we all need to start understanding is the difference between disability and limited mobility. An accessible place is not just exclusively for a person with a disability, but for all those people who, for one reason or another, find themselves in a condition of “limited mobility.”

Limited Mobility It is often confused with disability, and consequently, the “accessibility of a place” is interpreted as “a series of elements that make the place accessible to people with disabilities.” While it is indisputable that most people with physical disabilities have limited mobility, it is equally true that this condition applies to a much larger audience. Consequently, accessibility makes a place usable for many more users than just those associated with disability. This does not mean penalizing disability. On the contrary, expanding the user base means having many more accessible spaces available.

The most basic example is families with young children and strollers, but we could also talk about the elderly who find stairs challenging, or people who have undergone surgery and find their mobility limited for a certain period.

Which place would these people choose for shopping or a vacation? A store with automatic doors, or one where you have to push the door? From the image below, a beach like the ones on the left, or like those on the right?

The answer seems obvious, right? Yet, it’s not obvious to everyone. And often, it’s especially not obvious to those who should be in charge of accessibility. That’s why I always try to explain to businesses: Accessible Place = More Customers.

Many businesses have understood this and, speaking of beaches, more and more are making accessibility the key to gaining more customers. Some examples:

The above are examples I always try to give to both businesses and local administrations. Why? Imagine you have a limited mobility issue and want to go on vacation. How do you choose your destination? By only looking for an “accessible” hotel, or by also looking for a destination where the places to visit are accessible? I would opt for the second option; I wouldn’t go on vacation just to stay locked in a hotel, but to move around and explore as much as possible.

Below, you can see me presenting these concepts during a sustainable development event. During the event, we also showcased special bicycles for transporting people with disabilities, including those in wheelchairs. In the image on the top right, the town’s mayor wanted to be transported personally to see their functionality for himself. They have now purchased some of these bicycles and are working on expanding bike paths and general accessibility in public spaces. This is because they realized that greater accessibility—not just of businesses but of the entire territory—is an investment for the future.

Below is the link to the map of their park, created by me for Accessible Life:
Villa Guidini - Villa e Parco Accessibili

I leave you with a couple of videos on accessibility. They are a bit long but, in my opinion, absolutely worth watching. The first one is published by Google (the protagonist, by the way, is a dear friend of mine) and will make you reflect while bringing a smile to your face: Exploring Inclusion | Googlers meet USA Wheelchair Rugby Team

The second is a recording of a Live event by Geo for Good (Google Earth) in which I was invited as a panelist. It’s a bit long, but it delves deeper into the concepts I wanted to express in this topic:

“Leaders of four diverse, worldwide Accessibility and Disability Inclusion (ADI) initiatives will join Google’s Sasha Blair-Goldensohn and Page Ive to discuss how mapping technology can advance disability equity and help People With Disabilities explore, navigate and get things done in the world.”

Before closing, a few reading tips for some recent Connect topics that absolutely fascinated me:

I also recommend the important virtual meet-up taking place in three days: Virtual January 31 - Accessibility without Borders: Understanding Accessibility. I hope to be there, and I hope many of you will participate as well!

Thank you for reading, and I look forward to your comments.

Ermes

38 Likes

Cost or Investment? An incredible question @ErmesT , thought provoking. Now it is really a need of the hour. Today I had a meetup , I we Local Guides Community look for accessibility and Sustainability features of the places. Will write a recap after going home after my travels are done. Thanks for sharing about this kind of future devedevelopment and will try attending the meetup.

1 Like

Well, @Gurukrishnapriya , I believe this is the real question, that we have to keep in mind when we meet the businesses, because it’s what reduce the possibility to have more accessible places, due to the wrong idea that accessibility is just a cost.
When the businesses will understand that making their places accessible can help them to increase the income, the world will become more accessible for everyone

1 Like

It’s easy to think of accessibility as just another cost, but when you think about who it helps and how it connects more people, it seems like a true investment, not an cost.
Excellent post @ErmesT

2 Likes

@ErmesT Fantastic post! Thank you so much for writing such an enlightening text full of important information.

It makes me very happy every time I see someone thinking about accessibility, and for me it will always be a great investment for the present and the future.

Currently, no, because my daughter is a little older now, but speaking of strollers, when I moved to Toronto we had a lot of difficulty with the stroller in the stations, because not all of them have elevators, and those that have escalators indicate that you can’t go up with a stroller or wheelchair. And my question is: what do we do then? Sometimes the staff or users helped us, but most of the time we managed on our own.

Many metro stations here are being updated for accessibility, and another thing that makes me very happy is seeing that establishments I review sometimes lack accessibility features for people with disabilities, reduced mobility, and families with babies. I’ve received positive feedback regarding updates to their spaces.

And so, we’re changing the world a little bit.

2 Likes

Thank you @Ermest for this incredible and eye-opening article! Your explanation of the difference between ‘Disability’ and ‘Limited Mobility’ is a perspective that many of us often overlook.
It’s a powerful reminder that accessibility isn’t just a niche requirement for a few, but a universal necessity that expands the user base and brings more people together, whether it’s families with strollers, the elderly, or people recovering from surgery.

I particularly loved the real-world examples of accessible beaches and the special bicycles. Seeing the mayor personally testing them shows how impactful our advocacy as Local Guides can be for public administration.

On a personal note, I am deeply honored and humbled that you mentioned my post about mapping accessibility in Gerhagen alongside such experienced contributors.

As a new Local Guide, being recognized in such a magnificent article is a huge milestone for me.
The motivation and sense of belonging this has given me is beyond what I could have imagined before joining this community.

Thank you for your leadership and for inspiring us to see :wheelchair_symbol:accessibility as a true investment for the future.

1 Like

Thank you so much for your feedback, @NareshDarji , and, let me add, it’s easy to think about accessibility as just one more photo in Google Maps.
A photo that indeed is very important, but becomes even more important if we start to think that in this way we’re working for our own future.

1 Like

Absolutely right, @ErmesT

The words you said in the last virtual meet-up really touched my heart.

Look at my hair, it’s turning white, so in the near future I will also need to find accessible places.”

2 Likes

Thank you so much, @GasparKaren , for sharing your personal experience with us.

This is what I-ve seen in a metro station in New York (Midtown Manhattan) on May 2025.

Funny thing: I was traveling with @KarenVChin to meet privately with the head of the Accessibility Program at Google Maps, who is also a good friend of ours, as well as the protagonist of the videos in this post.

1 Like

Oh no, thank you for coming here, and in Connect, @Katarina_Cibikova

If you watched the second video you have for sure noticed that this aspect was highlighted also by people with more experience than me, and a different focus. In this case it was mentioned by Page Ivi from Google Travel

Oops, I realized just now that I forgot to add one of the photos (I will fix it now)

Yes and no, Katarina. I mean, many times my feeling is that while a lot of people mention accessibility in their topics just a few wants to really talk seriously about that. And when I find someone who really works on this topic, I am extremely happy.

This is such an important perspective. @ErmesT :clap:

Accessibility shouldn’t be seen as an extra expense, but as something that makes our communities stronger and more welcoming for everyone. When places are designed with inclusion in mind, it benefits not just people with disabilities, but families, seniors, and even businesses in the long run.

Thank you for starting this post and encouraging us to think about accessibility as an investment in the future.

Sure, @SayliWalve
In my country, and I’m sure that also in yours, there is a law about how to design new businesses, with strict rules about the accessibility features.
But in my country, like in yours, there are cities with centuries of history, built ages ago.
In that case, often a business just see accessibility as a cost, and we can help a lot not only highlighting accessibility features, but also the lack of them. Venice is in fact one of the less accessible cities of the world and, as it’s usually full of tourists, businesses are prone to think that they don’t need to improve. In this our reviews are playing an important role, because in that way they start to see that the lack of accessibility is under the spotlights.
Money, as usual, (or the potential lack of them) is a powerful leverage

1 Like

That’s a powerful perspective :clap:

I completely agree. We value these centuries of history in cities like Venice, but that history often acts as a physical barrier in the modern world. You’re spot on about the leverage of money; once a business realizes that lack of accessibility is becoming part of their brand identity through public reviews, it stops being a saved cost and starts being a lost opportunity. Transparency is definitely the first step toward change :+1:

1 Like

I really appreciate your thoughts on this.

The way you framed accessibility as an investment rather than a cost makes a lot of sense. In the long run, it benefits everyone, not just a specific group. As someone whose mother recently experienced a heart attack, I found how accessible places helped us to reconsider our choices about the places we shall visit and which ones to avoid. I totally feel this, and this has also added a layer of motivation for me to convince at least a few business owners to make some changes to begin with.

Thank you for sharing my article @ErmesT :innocent: