Merci @AdamGT pour la rectification.
J’ai bien peur qu’il y ait également un problème avec le classement Star Photo Views/Day by Country Leaderboard #417 sur lequel je figurais le mois précédent. Désolé, je n’avais pas vu à la première lecture.
It’s very strange because no one else has reported 403 errors @curatorofmemory. I suggest you try:
- A different browser or even try accessing the System in an incognito window. Right click this link and select Open link in incognito window.
- Clear your cache /cookies
Oh yes @claude_richard this will be because of the same issue. I should have realised this myself. I have now corrected this.
Hi mr @AdamGT As well as the team…
I think all is about the inquiry from ma’am @cuicani and the answer of Mr @tony_b if the views must increase beyond 1% before getting different from the last views why not set things like on every two months! Cause I do believe that at that time it could be with an large different!..at least for an average persons …
It’s just an point of view from me !
Thanks for everyone’s effort and énergies!.
#LG.
This would be a bit awkward @Laurent, as the whole range of Leaderboards are set up to run on a monthly cadence. It also will not do much for LGs like me whose Star Photo is a “red star”. My next 1% movement is due when I accumulate another 21,379 views, but my true average monthly increase in the 6 months before the system changed was 251 views per month or 8 views per day. That will take another 7 years to accomplish, so I don’t think we could set the Leaderboard publication based on anomalies.
« Excellente idée de débat @AdamGT ! Pour répondre à votre question sur l’intérêt des valeurs stables, je propose un compromis simple et efficace : ajouter un filtre interactif comme dans Excel ou Google Sheets, sur la colonne “Star Photo Views” avec 2 options : “En hausse”, “Stable”.
- Ça garde le classement complet actuel (stabilité + tendances).
- Les utilisateurs choisissent ce qu’ils veulent voir en un clic.
- Plus engageant et moderne, sans alourdir la présentation.
Qu’en pensez-vous ? Par contre je ne sais pas si la modification est facile à mettre en œuvre.
@Laurent I have to agree with @tony_b on this. It’s already a nightmare so unnecessarily adding or trying to cater for such nuances may not be a wise move.
That’s an excellent suggestion @claude_richard however, while I could certainly do this on the T100 Leaderboard System website, unfortunately the Connect platform does not allow such “sophisticated and dynamic” UI features ![]()
ok get it Mr @tony_b ..
It’s clear too Mr @AdamGT ..at this point I think the main suggestion from Mr @AdamGT himself will be the right one though the proposing idea from Mr @claude_richard is a little bit unset for ..
Why not then ![]()
#LG.