JanVanHaver's post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Reconsider selection criteria for new places

graffiti-569265_1280.jpg

 

The Goole Maps help section mentions "You can publicly add places, like a business or landmark, to the map", but when you click through to the pages with more details on which types of places exactly can be added, you land on the Google My Business help pages, listing eligible and ineligible businesses. A similar focus on businesses is reflected in the list of categories available to choose from.

My proposal is to move a bit away from this 'businesses-first-focus' and rather consider anything eligible to be added to the map which can be a destination for users of Google maps. Those are not always in search of something they want to buy - there can be lots of other types of destinations. An example would be some types of publicly accessible art forms. Right now there are categories for 'Tourist attraction' and 'Statue' and that's about it. But what about street art like e.g. murals? Those can not really be called a Tourist attraction in the sense you would plan your next trip abroad just to see it, but might very well be a destination for someone exploring a new city. This leads to awkward situations whereby even a very famous one by Keith Haring in Pisa is currently categorized as 'Exhibit'. By the way: if you want to see some really nice ones, check out this post started by HUMVILA.

 

Another domain where examples can easily be found is health-related POIs, such as

  • AEDs, an idea already suggested by AndrewCU (here) davidhyno (here), JMcG (here), RohithaF (here), I_SS_A (here) and Volkert (here) in other posts
  • baby hatch, as suggested by TorM (here)
  • safe injection sites (another suggestion from RohithaF) 

 

Also various water-related destinations seem hard to map right now, as shown in the post by Shahak_B about canal locks, based on his personal experience, the post by Nick-Hobgood on dive sites, which can be meaningful destinations both from the divers' and from an environmental perspective, the post by Elaa about offshore installations and this post by Arni on water ways. And as AJJvBEEK points out in one of the comments below: lighthouses are also not available as category to select. In another comment (page 9 of the comments) JordanBurleson mentions the new trend in water-related amusement: splash pads (or spraygrounds).

 

In the field of waste management and recycling, additional categories could be helpful as well, as e.g. illustrated in the posts about

  • dustbins by Jaidev_Kalla (here), Sanaidhgupta (here), Jhilikmukherjee (here) and ChandraBanu (here)
  • donation boxes by RohithaF (here)
  • recycling station by Clemersondesales (here)

 

And fellow local guides I jxsarlo and DAvagnina point out (here and here) that people practicing outdoor sports will most certainly benefit from having the possibility to add certain types of nature elements. Another nature-related suggestion was made by GEORGECANDERSON in his post on protected trees.

Check out LetsGuide Podcast | #LGCTM | Please always @Mention me so I see your reply
467 Comments
Level 8

Maps would need a nautic layer/ mode though. It would be very unhelpful if certain info like that appears on everybody's base map.

But I agree, there are enough boaters of us out there that would benefit from this kind of (navigational) map type information 🙂

Level 6

AED locations hold save lives. Most are installed by charity groups.

Level 9

I don't know which categories you are referring to, i just got these (screenshot is given), when I tried to add a missing place. few months later when i was adding a primary school  i was getting the option of "Islamic school" only.I use map in English or Hindi . the screen shot attached will tell you the problem these are all the categories which are available to methese are all the categories which are available to me

 

Level 4

I have always noticed...that the categories for arts and culture on google maps very limiting....

Connect Moderator

Absolutely right, @Artsies. In fact, I have also posted on that topic a while ago, and that is now one of the most popular ideas here:

 

https://www.localguidesconnect.com/t5/All-Ideas/Reconsider-selection-criteria-for-new-places/idi-p/1...

 

Please also vote for it if you like it.

Check out LetsGuide Podcast | #LGCTM | Please always @Mention me so I see your reply
Connect Moderator

@shaily please have a look at this post - it might be the solution to your problem (which I had faced myself too):

 

https://www.localguidesconnect.com/t5/Mapping-Your-World/Best-Practice-Find-the-right-category/m-p/8...

Check out LetsGuide Podcast | #LGCTM | Please always @Mention me so I see your reply
Former Google Contributor

Thanks for sharing, @Artsies. Would you like to share some suggestions with how make cultural content more visible?

 

Also, your post is getting a Google Maps label. That way people who might want to contribute to your comment would find it easier.

Due to the volume of private messages Googlers receive, I do not read or respond to private messages. Please post publicly so others may benefit from your discussion. If you require urgent assistance, please tag a Google Moderator. Thank you!
Level 8

Thanks Jan well done 

Level 8

 Zelo dobro Google bi motal to naredit, da se kot turist v drugi državi ali v drugem mestu lažje znajdeš. 

 

l live in an island and as a content creator for photography and video, show some of my sweet spots is my thing, but sometimes is really hard to do it, if the description of the place doesnt fit unto default categories. examples.

 

No categories for, 

sunk boats and planes , stranded ships, undiscovered ruins,  hidden pyramids, cocodrile pits. parks, sunset spots.  and swimming natural pools and more and more sites l would love to share but its impossible if doesnt fit the narrow description of the software, please help !!

so much content to share !