2 - Structure of the Leaderboards
A Level Playing Field
Obviously, the earlier that a LG started contributing the more points and views that that LG would most likely have and also, would have levelled up higher through the 10 LG levels (more time = more reviews + more photo views + more Edits etc = more points). So comparing the points and views of a later starter with that of LGs that started years ago wouldn’t be comparing apples with apples and you would hardly expect the late starters to have any chance of getting on any Top 100 list, if there was one and only one based on rankings of points and, although not impossible, but also likely if there was only one based on photo views!
It’s because of this that I wanted to try, as best as I could, to create a level playing field that gave every LG, regardless of when they started and what LG level they were at, the chance to participate and be on a Top 100 leaderboard. This has been achieved and regardless of the total number of photos or reviews you’ve added to Maps, regardless on the total photo views you have, regardless if you come from a large city or a small rural village, regardless on whether you are a Level 1 or already a “top shot” Level 10 Local Guide, you can participate and get on the Top 100 leaderboards on this level playing field! To achieve this, each of the different streams of Top 100 Leaderboards (Points, Photo Views and Star Photos) include a set of leaderboards and the core of these being:
- One overall leaderboard where out of all participating LGs the top 100, regardless of their Local Guide level are included, and
- A leaderboard for each LG level including the top 100 LGs at that level.
So recapping, the essential idea of having these different leaderboards is that all things being equal, one would expect that a Local Guide at a higher Local Guide level would have done more guiding or perhaps been guiding for longer than one at lower levels and hence, would more than likely have already taken many more photos, attracted more photo views, made more contributions and earned more points. If this was a marathon or some other long distance foot race, or an ascent of Mt Everest, other than in a handicap, obviously those that start earlier will reach the destination sooner.
In this way, having leaderboards for each Local Guide level is used as a leveler! In this way you can see and compare your Maps contributions relative to your peers; for example, a Level 8 Local Guide can see his/her photo view performance relative to other Level 8s, a Level 7 Local Guide can see their photo view performance relative to other Level 7s, and so on! One can of course argue that a Local Guide that say just became a Level 8 would have had less guiding and hence less photo views and points than one who is just about to become a Level 9. This is true however what I have done is the best that we can do. I have also included statistical data such as calculating the median value for each leaderboard to give you yet another yardstick!
Additional to the core 𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘀, 𝗣𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀 and 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿 𝗣𝗵𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘀 leaderboards, based on further analysis, a number of additional leaderboard variants that present different ways of looking at each of core data of all participating LG’s are included. Some of these are described below:
Points Leaderboards
Leaderboard of All participating Local Guides
This is a leaderboard of the top 100 participating Local Guides ranked by points on the date indicated.
Leaderboard of Movers and Shakers
This is a leaderboard of the top 100 participating Local Guides ranked by change in monthly points on the date indicated. For new participants the Points since and % Change values are shown as ? since the date in the previous month was not available. For Local Guides who did not update their points prior to posting the current month’s Points leaderboard, the Points since and % Change values are shown as 0.
Photo Views Leaderboards
Leaderboard of All participating Local Guides
This is a leaderboard of the top 100 participating Local Guides ranked by photo views on the date indicated. The leaderboards immediately following this show this overall leaderboard broken down into individual leaderboards for each Local Guide level so that you can readily see and compare your photo views relative to that of your peers.
Average Views per Photo Leaderboard
This is one of my favorite leaderboards. In this leaderboard, the photo views achievement of participating Local Guides is shown in the order of average views per photo. The essential idea here is that the average views per photo gives a good overall single measure of the quality of a Local Guide’s photo contributions on Google Maps; the higher the average views per photo, the higher the overall quality of a Local Guide’s Google Maps photos. Of course this is an average figure and there are problems with averages but still I think it’s a nice simple way of looking at the overall quality of our photo contributions on Maps. What’s really interesting from this leaderboard is that often we see that some Local Guides show much better average views per photo than Local Guides at higher Local Guide levels! For example, I’m a Level 10 Local Guide yet there are many Local Guides at lower LG levels that are out performing me! I’m learning from this guys 
If we accept that the average views per photo gives a good overall measure of a Local Guide’s photo contributions on Maps then one way to improve your overall photo performance is to have less but better quality photos: the more views you have for a smaller number of photos will result in a higher average views per photo and a good way to achieve this is to have less but better quality photos for each review.
Star Photo Leaderboards
Leaderboard of All participating Local Guides
This is a leaderboard of the top 100 participating Local Guides’ star photos ranked by star views on the date indicated and as you can see, it’s packed to the brim with details and if you hover over the Maps Category shown for any entry you will see the name of the actual place that that particular Local Guide’s star photo refers to and if you click on that Category you will be taken to the actual star photo screenshot.
Average Views per Day
As well as showing the star views, the leaderboards show the star photo’s average views per day which is a measure of quality of the star photo - how bright the star is shining on average each day - the higher this number, the brighter is the star on a day by day basis. In this way, if two stars have say 10,000 star views but one has been on Maps only half as long as the other, then you would say that this younger star has twice the average views per day or twice as bright as the first star! This value is similar to the overall quality measure shown in Average Views per Photo Leaderboard mentioned in Section 2.2.2 above and because of its significance, there is a separate leaderboard included that ranks the Top 100 star photos of participating Local Guides in average views per day order (Leaderboard #9).
While the Average Views per Day value is a good way of comparing the quality of our star photo to that of others, it doesn’t indicate how our star views compares to the views of all of our other photos. Consider two Local Guides, Rod and Stewart. At a given point in time, Rod has 10 photos and the photo views of each are as shown in this table.
Photo No > |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Photo Views > |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
90 |
550 |
Stewart has 4 photos with the following photo views:
Photo No > |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Photo Views > |
20 |
30 |
400 |
550 |
You can see that both star photos have 550 star views and if you do the sums both represent 55% of the total views! However, for both Rod and Stewart knowing this 55% doesn’t tell us how much “stronger” or “brighter” the respective star photos are when compared to their other photos. It’s clear that Rod has a much stronger star photo with significantly more views than any of his other 9 photos - the star photo is significantly brighter than the others but this is not the case for Stewart! So we can’t use the star photo’s percentage of total views as a measure of our relative star’s strength compared to all of our other photos!
A better solution is to determine how many views does our start photo have compared to the average views of all of our photos and this is what the quotient SPQ indicates. If you do the sums, Rod’s SPQ value is 5.5 indicating that the star photo is 5.5 times brighter than the average of all of Rod’s photos and Stewart’s quotient value is only 2.2, clearly indicating that in Stewart’s case, his star photo is not much brighter than at least one of his other photos! One problem with calculating the SPQ quotient in this way is that the views of the star photo itself are included in calculating the average. For this reason I would have preferred to calculate SPQ values based on the median photo views rather than the average so as to eliminate the influence of outliers, including the star photo itself! Based on the median photo views Rod’s SPQ is 10 and that of Stewart is 2.6 which better indicates the strength of Rod’s star photo. Unfortunately however, based on the information available to us, it is not possible for me to calculate each Local Guide’s median photo views value.
Country x Country Leaderboards
Points x Country Leaderboard of All participating Local Guides
This is a leaderboard of the top 100 participating Local Guides ranked by points and country on the date indicated. This leaderboard may well be revised!!
2.3.4 - Links on Leaderboards
- Selecting any of the Connect Usernames will take you to that Local Guide’s Connect Profile
- Hovering over any of the Maps Category entries should show the name of the relevant Place of Interest.
- Selecting the Maps Category will take you to that Local Guide’s star photo.
3 - Leaderboard conventions
- Entries shown in [ ] indicate Local Guides who joined in that month.
- Entries shown in ( ) indicate Local Guides who in the last month jumped up a Local Guide level.
- A clickable Username will take you to that Local Guides’ Connect profile where you may see a link to that user’s Google Maps profile.
- Where other entries on a leaderboard are shown as links, as with all links, clicking on them will take you to specific details about that Local Guide’s entry.
- A Connect Username followed by ** indicates that that user is a Googler.
- A Connect Username followed by * indicates that that user is a Connect Moderator.
- Median values shown on the leaderboards are highlighted in a Cyan background. If your value on any leaderboard happens to be the median value then it will be shown in a Cyan background.
Just because you are a given level Local Guide does not necessarily guarantee that you will be on that respective level leaderboard. You must be in the top 100 Local Guides at a given level to be included on that level’s leaderboard. For example, Janice a level 8 Local Guide has 24,500 points but a 100 other level 8 Local Guides have points greater than 24,500. Therefore it follows that Janice will not make it onto the level 8 points leaderboard. Note here that while a Local Guide may not make it onto their respective Local Guide level leaderboard they might make it onto one of the 10 spots immediately below the top 100, know as the knocking on the door group.
Note also, as each of the leaderboards contain only up to 100 Local Guides, while you may make it onto the leaderboard of your respective Local Guide level, you might not make it onto any one or all of the overall leaderboards or if you do, you might well fall off these sooner than you might off the leaderboard of your respective Local Guide level. You can read more about this in the Snakes & Ladders section.