Points , Levels and badges are fun and we tend to give away some important factors for them .It is time we realize our way of contributions. It was with me , i used to add many photographs to a place and they made no sense apart from the points , but 3 years down the line , i understand things better .
We tend to add lots of picture to a place , which in most of the cases are not required .
If the place has very few photographs , then may be
if you have added the place then may be we will add quite a good number of photos
But isn’t it enough to add few best pictures ?
Here is a beautiful post from @PaulPavlinovich called How-Many-Photos , just go through this to have a fair idea about how many pictures to a place .
I am here to help you calculate an approximation of how many pictures you add to a place .
Open your contributions , and the go to your Master Photographer Badge , Here is a view of it , there you can find the number of photos you have added along with the number of places you have added photos to .
Just look at the volume and the reach
volume divided by Reach will give you a fair approximation , so in my case
(Volume/Reach)=Average Photos per Place ;
(16749/6104) = 2.743 ; => Approximately 3 Photos per place .
I feel this average being less less than 10 is quite fine but after that you need to analyze if you are adding quite too many photos or not .
If your photos are good and helping then the numbers are fine but if they are not then you need to stop adding many and select the best ad add .
Thanks and regards
Naren Chandra
