Finding & Adding Points Of Interest in A Tourist Destination

Greetings, my fellow Local Guides :wave:t4:

We are vacationing in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, this week and truly having a wonderful time. Personally, I haven’t been to Myrtle Beach since I was in high school, so I was excited to visit for a number of reasons!

First, I was looking forward to enjoying the sun, sand and sea :sunrise_over_mountains:

Second, I was looking forward to seeing what has changed in the decades since my last trip. My memories involved spectacular miniature golf courses, surf shops on every corner and the beach hotel we stayed at… a modern 5 story building across the street from the office, which was the “old motel” on the beach side of the street.

(The mini golf courses are now even more spectacular and the surf shops even bigger. However, I’m a bit sad to say, neither hotel building is still standing.)

Lastly, I was really looking forward to doing some __Google Mapping__in a city I’ve never mapped :earth_asia:

As a tourist destination, there are obviously POIs that will receive a lot of search interest. This means a lot of Photo Views and Review Views. But, there are also less obvious ways to improve Maps that sometimes are literally staring you in the face…

While we were strolling the Boardwalk, I noticed a number of people stopping to take a photo with something. I was curious to see what they were photographing, so I walked over after the last group and saw what’s in the photo below:

It was a huge sandcastle that says Myrtle Beach!

I immediately snapped a handful of photos, then continued on our stroll. When we stopped to grab a few slices of pizza from NY Pizza Kitchen, I searched __Maps__for the sandcastle. I wanted to share my favorite photo. :camera_flash:

I was honestly surprised when I was unable to locate it. How could this be? This is clearly a wonderful photo opportunity that the city of Myrtle Beach paid to have created and installed. People were obviously already using it, so I thought “maybe I’m just searching for the wrong name?” I switched to the satellite view on Maps and zoomed in to the exact location. There was no name or link to click.

Realizing that this is something that people would love to know exists, I created the place on Google Maps - Myrtle Beach Sandcastle - and crossed my fingers that it would be approved.

I must admit, I didn’t have much faith in the approval. When we arrived earlier in the week, I noticed one of those large Adirondack chairs in the airport… the type that people enjoy for photo ops. I attempted to add it to Maps in the morning, the same day I would later add the Sandcastle. The Margaritaville Big Chair was pending all morning, which left me to think Sandcastle would suffer the same fate. But, to my surprise - They were both approved SIMULTANEOUSLY!

This was just what I was hoping for. I had now created two new Points Of Interest for people to share their photos to and to easily share as destination with others. I imagine this is what those who created these photo opportunities were hoping for, but failed to realize they needed to be shared to be located.

When I first began Mapping, I always assumed that there would be fewer opportunities to add to Maps in popular, tourist areas. I thought that someone more experienced would have had to already have been there and beat me to the punch. But, as one of those more experienced Guides now, I can safely say that there are ALWAYS opportunities to add and share new places on Google Maps. Sometimes you have to think outside the box, but others - just like these two - are staring you in the face… like these turtles below :point_down:t4:

These three were hanging out at the other end of the Boardwalk. I noticed them when I stopped to take a storefront photo of a POI. Again, I watched as a family paused to take photos with them. They were all smiling :grin: I knew that these needed to be shared with__Maps__, as well, so I created the add - Myrtle Beach Turtles - as a tourist attraction. I think the AI had figured out what I was doing by this time, as it was approved instantly.

I truly hope that the creation of these POIs assist others in locating these fun and creative photo opportunities, while traveling to Myrtle Beach with their family or friends. I know that the groups I witnessed taking photos seemed to really enjoy the opportunity. If you happen to visit the area, make sure to take photos and share them!

I hope this post will inspire my fellow Local Guides to be encouraged to find new places and ways to add to Maps, no matter how popular the location may be. For those that are unaware of how to create POIs on Maps, I’ll share the process in Comments.

Thanks for reading, hopefully you have found this post to be helpful & informative. :blush:

All my best,

Mike

30 Likes

How to add a place courtesy of Google help

2 Likes

@Mikeinthefalls great post to share with the community. I’m always amazed how many of these types of landmarks/attractions are not on Maps as a POI. You truly have an eye for finding the ones that aren’t. I’d be curious how many total views you these types of POI’s you’ve added!

3 Likes

Thank you @Mikeinthefalls and surely you are inspiring many of us to continue adding new places. Like you, whenever I get a chance to come and visit a new place, I check on the Maps and see what’s there and not there yet. That sandcastle looks stunning indeed. Those new PoI will certainly help many others coming here. Thanks for tagging me, Mike!

I visited Myrtle Beach as well back in 2015 with my family! We stopped by there on our way to Florida. Kids surely love the beach…

2 Likes

Thanks @MelTG

I am all about sharing what works for me, as you know! Hopefully some of our fellow LGs will find it encouraging and the info useful.

I was scrolling on IG and discovered there’s one more “photo spot” in the center that we must’ve walked right by :person_shrugging:t4::male_sign: :laughing: So, yes - There’s always an opportunity to add to Maps, even after we’ve been there.

I may have to look up my edits and see if I can calculate a total number of Views…

You are one I always think to tag @indahnuria as I always appreciate your perspective and enjoy when you share your travels!

I’m very glad to hear that you enjoyed the post :hugs: I do hope that this simple post will inspire others to find and add new POI, no the location.

What a great photo of you enjoying the Boardwalk! There’s a great deal to there, I’m glad you were able to visit. When it’s warm, I prefer an overcast sky. Makes the day more enjoyable instead of having to find some shade, from the sweltering sun :sun_with_face:

1 Like

@Mikeinthefalls

Good stuff! Thanks so much for sharing.

Scheria

Update:

This post gave me the courage to go take some photos of places I believe should be added to Google Maps. I read and reread the post and comments as directed then hit submit. I am happy to report that all 4 new places I had in mind were approved within 5 minutes. Thanks for helping me achieve this!

3 Likes

Hello @Scheria I’m so glad to read that you found your helpful!

I’m even happier to see that you were not only inspired to make adds, but they were also approved :partying_face: I’m proud to be the first person to give your Review of Myrna’s Outlook a :+1:t4: You made some really nice additions!

Keep that good work going in 2024 :star_struck:

1 Like

@Mikeinthefalls

Thanks again! So glad to have stumbled across your article. It has helped me unlock several levels of the trailblazer badge. Thanks for all your support…

Scheria

1 Like

Hi @Mikeinthefalls

Respectfully I would like to discuss your decisions to add the sandcastle and a chair as new places.

Using the category Tourist attractions is in my opinion too creative use of this category.

We had parallel discussions over the years. Can the individual attractions in a theme park and the individual play structures in a playground be added on Maps? Because there is a category called Amusement ride we concluded that the individual rides can have each their own pin. But not the swings and the slide in a playground. Mostly because there is not a category for them, and because repeating the category Playground for structures inside a playground makes little to no sense.

When I think of a tourist attractions it is something big. Myrtle Beach Boardwalk and Promenade is the tourist attractions here. Categorizing small things like Myrtle Beach Sandcastle another tourist attraction just because there is no specific category for sandcastles is not correct.

We should only add places that can be found on the list of categories, and creative use if the categories is discouraged. They are likely to be removed.

By the way you forgot to set the Located in field.

Regarding the sandcastle you could consider the category Sculpture. But to me sculptures are reserved to pieces art created by a respected artist. So I would not even had added it using the sculpture category.

Then there is the aspect of this maybe being a temporary or seasonal thing. Temporary structures should not be added on Google Maps.

Then there is the bigger question: Is it more helpful to Maps users to have a separate pin for the sandcastle or is it better to just share such photos to the actual tourist attraction which is Myrtle Beach. To keep Maps well organized I think it is better not to have this individual pin. Many or maybe most visitors will likely not know of the existence of this pin and just upload their photos to Myrtle Beach. I believe this will be messy.

I see many tourist attractions that pride them selves of having one big pin with tons and tons of photos and reviews. They do no want to maintain more smaller pins on Google Maps. The more photos and reviews the more important and popular the place must be. So clearly owners would prefer one and not many pins.

Likewise, the visitors are more likely to discover the sandcastle if such photos are to be found under the Myrtle Beach pin and not this much lower ranking new pin.

Last thing: You invented the name. This is generally not what we should do. Descriptive names are a no go.

I am not posting this to talk against you or your respectable intention to inspire more LGs to add missing places on Maps. That is all perfect.

Instead, I hope to inspire a discussion of the need and correctness of adding a temporary sandcastle and a chair as individual pins using the categories very creatively.

All the best

Morten

@Mikeinthefalls

One last thing. I live in a dense city with a ton of historic sculptures, landmarks etc. And I know that very few tourists are able to add their photos to the correct pins. Actually is is a huge mess.

Having more and smaller pins will only make this problem worse.

Roger and over

Morten

I’m a creative guy, what can I say? It’s a photo opp tourist attraction that was installed by the city of Myrtle Beach, not sure what you’re not seeing about that? @MortenCopenhagen

It’s not a castle made from sand, it’s a permanent fixture located on the boardwalk.

They aren’t a handful of living turtles that just happened to climb up on the boardwalk to sun for an afternoon. They are made from durable materials and intended to be interacted with.

Yes, the Myrtle Beach boardwalk is a much larger attraction, but there are also small attractions that are worthy of a place on Maps and I found these to be worthy of adding. It would seem that Google agreed, as they were approved and have been up since September.

People have added photos and reviews, thus confirming their legitimacy and people’s interest.

It’s not like I’m walking around, just adding park benches, merry go rounds and teeter totters. Maybe it’s a cultural difference between America and Denmark, but I think tourist photo ops are pretty universal? :person_shrugging:t4::male_sign:

I checked Maps and I don’t see an overwhelming amount of pins cluttering up the boardwalk, so I think things are good for now. :+1:t4:

:beers:

1 Like

Myrtle Beach doesn’t have an overabundance of culturally significant sculptures or landmarks and is pretty sparsely populated @MortenCopenhagen

I can’t foresee a cluttering of pins ever becoming an issue.

1 Like

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: @MortenCopenhagen

Nothing better to do with your time than have 2 of my POI removed? That’s rich. In case you weren’t sure before, please know now - I do not like you.

Cheers, mate :beers:

1 Like

@MortenCopenhagen I’m curious as to what makes your addition of this more legitimate than my city commissioned sandcastle?

Caption: A screenshot of a “sculpture” in Denmark

1 Like

I do not add superfluous photos or points of interest. :100: @MortenCopenhagen

I don’t know what you’re issue with me is, but I kindly request you to issue me an apology or cease further contact with me.

1 Like

@Mikeinthefalls

Your accusation and one of your wordings are out of line.

I did my best to explain the problem related to misuse of categories without making it personal, and I even mentioned that inappropriate use of categories runs a high risk of getting removed from Google Maps.

After reading your replies I’m still of the opinion that the two places in question are not in themselves something that can or will attract tourists. They are elements inside the larger tourist attraction. If “Photo opportunity” was an available category on Maps then for sure they would be mappable.

Respectfully, we do not need to agree on this.

Morten

Thankfully Google Maps isn’t based on @MortenCopenhagen 's opinion. Why don’t you go back to editing the places that you’ve added as “Temporarily Closed” so you can build your edit points higher and leave my page alone? What… Didn’t think anyone ever noticed? :+1:t4:

35 seconds of scrolling the Myrtle Beach Boardwalk and Promenade resulted in 16 photos of the turtles and the sand castle. I’d say they’re pretty popular! I’m sorry that you don’t find them enjoyable @MortenCopenhagen but plenty of tourists have. Feel free to have a look if you think otherwise.