There is a simple explanation for that @Steve_UK (and @Peadar) and if you wanted to you could find the answer for it here on Connect.
1 Like
U my friend do the calculations
My ex school teacher maths from
India said your quite the exception
maybe a pop at me
we both ended up learning a lot
pie never changes
Me too @Steve_UK, LMAO 
2 Likes
No @Peadar, he’s just a little confused.
1 Like
Your analysis is incorrect @PrasadVR 
1 Like
You’re a poet,
And you know it.
Thank you @Peadar for adding brilliant photos to distract us all very nicely from the challenge in this somewhat dry, essentially just about numbers, topic.
2 Likes
Ok, esta es mi segunda teoría: el local guide A tuvo una nueva Star Photo en el mes de febrero que sobrepasó las vistas del anterior y que se cargó en Google Maps en una fecha más reciente que la primera.
3 Likes
Confusion is only a tactic of the week
Weak
with time & only time
the crossroads we see
I personally suffer internally
From myself
But LGC is a happy place
to coexist
with such good friends
hopefully we see more
I wonder why?
Oh there’s that 1%. It keeps haunting us 
1 Like
Nor does it ever end 
1 Like
update all
surprise us
5 seconds
each
Every month
just like me
in feb 2024
7th in fact
my views increased
did it dispel me
no
Define to me
a local guide
3.14
becomes useless
again & it’s value
if u don’t want a
pie
try an eclipse
@AdamGT the most confusing thing with LG A’s chart is how can it have more avg views per day than star views itself ? The pink bar is going above blue bar. How’s something becomes more when it’s divided by significant a numbers ?
Secondly in Feb 2025 he might have picked up a new star photo that seems decaying too. Or he just entered wrong numbers or reset onset date of the star Photo.
1 Like
Note, there are different scales for each, @Trail_blazer. Steps of 10,000 for the Star Views (blue) on the left and steps of 100 on the right. So, that is correct.
2 Likes
Thanks @WilfriedB how did I ignore it 
I guess I zoomed it too much and never checked the other end 
1 Like
LG-A; There was no change in the star photo’s views from January 2024 onward, so the average views per day steadily declined from January 2024 to January 2025 (Period 1), as expected. However, from February 2025 to May 2025 (Period 2), the average views per day unexpectedly increased in February 25, despite no additional views. This indicates that the denominator in the average calculation-the number of days since the photo was uploaded-was reduced during Period 2. Therefore, it is evident that the recorded upload date of the star photo was changed between these two periods on Top 100, leading to an inaccurate calculation of the average views per day. Assuming the star photo remained unchanged between both periods (January 2024–January 2025 and February 2025–May 2025).
4 Likes
@AdamGT @WilfriedB @Trail_blazer
Grundsätzlich gefallen mir solche Charts nicht besonders aber ich habe es mir erklären lassen 
It’s an interesting scenario that you’ve come up with @LightRich but know that is not the answer!
1 Like
I see that @WilfriedB has explained this.
This was suggested by @LightRich and no this is not the answer @Trail_blazer
2 Likes
You’re on the ball there @WilfriedB. Thank you for explaining this to @Trail_blazer and others who may not have bee aware of this..
1 Like