Aliased POI 's?

This may be more of a question than a problem/bug report … but, I sometimes find that when I upload a photo for a particular POI in Google Maps it will subsequently be listed under a different POI when I do the QC of my upload under “Your Contributions-Photos”. One example: I shared some photo’s of the “Great Scotland Yard” building in London. But, when I did the QC I saw that the photo’s actually arrived at the “Trafalgar Square” POI.

I have also experienced to upload a photo to one POI, and then find that two other POI’s, in the near neighborhood, contain the same photo. Is it perhaps so that some POI’s are mapped to other POI’s? Any idea @KatyaL or others?

9 Likes

@vaarre

To better understand your question it will be very helpful if you add a link of the photo, and on the POIs where the photo is visible.

This said, it is very possible that, photos added in a POI, are also visible on a square, or in a city.

This is an automatic process, that explain also why there are photos on Location (not POIs) where is not possible to add photos

Just to give you an example, if you search for my city, Treviso, you will find a lot of photos that in fact have been added to some Historical place, or landmark, in the same city. This is one of mine

If you look at the photo you will see, on the top left, the name of the location where the photo has been added

And, in fact, you will find the photo there: Porta san Tomaso

3 Likes

@ErmesT

I tried to upload three photo’s of the entrance of the Greater Scotland Yard to this location:

https://www.google.no/maps/place/Great+Scotland+Yard,+Westminster,+London,+Storbritannia/@51.5063501,-0.1279632,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x487604cf07b5bca7:0x6bc6e7b25853dff8!8m2!3d51.5065222!4d-0.1259946?hl=no

But, instead the images landed at the “Trafalgar Square” location, together with a few images which I actually took at Trafalgar Square.

Here are all the pictures I uploaded in the area (including my three pictures of the Great Scotland Yard building entrance):

https://www.google.no/maps/contrib/118290152654969530505/place/ChIJH-tBOc4EdkgRJ8aJ8P1CUxo/@51.508039,-1.2486745,8z/data=!4m6!1m5!8m4!1e2!2s118290152654969530505!3m1!1e1?hl=no

Strange. I have other examples as well.

@ErmesT

This is btw how my upload appears in “Your Contributions”. The upload is explicit that the receiving location is “Trafalgar Square”:

1 Like

This make sense, @vaarre

Great Trafalgar, the link that you shared with us, is part of the map layer, not a POI.

There is not an add photos button in there, because, according to the rules, you cannot add photos to addresses or coordinates.

How did you managed to add the photo in there?

1 Like

Hi @ErmesT ,

I took the photo’s with my Android cell phone, then clicked share on Google Maps. Google Maps suggested a location, which was not the wanted one. Then I clicked “select other location” and searched for “Great Scotland Yard”. That option appeared in my search, and I hence then uploaded to that “Great Scotland Yard” choice. No problems. But, when I then did an upload QC in “Your Contributions” I saw that the pictures landed at “Trafalgar Square”.

I have a hunch that I am confusing map locations and POI’s, and that I incidentally actually managed to upload images to a map location?

2 Likes

Hi again @ErmesT ,

I just did an experiment. I found a previously unpublished picture (of me, I generally try to avoid posting photos with people in them, so still unpublished until now). I uploaded through my Android cell phone (Samsung S8+). I uploaded it to the location “Sola”. No problems. Here is my new upload list:

https://www.google.no/maps/contrib/118290152654969530505/photos/@59.6265113,5.44872,8z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m3!8m2!3m1!1e1?hl=no

As you see, the location I uploaded to appears to be part of the map layer (a county):

https://www.google.no/maps/place/Sola/@58.8820458,5.2149038,11z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m8!1m2!2m1!1ssola!3m4!1s0x463a5b241b717c25:0x4d6f0a929a7942b9!8m2!3d58.8617599!4d5.2061383?hl=no

Complicating it further, we also have another “Sola” location, this time the city center:

https://www.google.no/maps/place/4050+Sola/@58.8887958,5.6530475,14z/data=!4m8!1m2!2m1!1ssola!3m4!1s0x463a498c796e664f:0x6a273de8a2709c2f!8m2!3d58.8887958!4d5.6530475?hl=no

And my pictures appear at this place as well. Maybe the root cause to my confusion is that my app actually allows me to upload pictures to Map locations, which is contrary to Google Maps usage rules?

1 Like

Trafalgar Square is a POI, @vaarre

Probably the closest POI to Great Scotland Yard.

I suppose you want to add the photo to the hotel, isn’t it?

In this case you need to delete your photo from Trafalgar Square first, using the three dots.

The photo will probably remain visible for a few hours, waiting for the database to synchronise, this is not an issue.

Then you can choose the POI on maps and click on “add a photo”

1 Like

Yes, this is a know issue, already reported by me several times, @vaarre

Btw, I can’t see your pictures on the place, even clicking on “latest” even if I can see the photo on your profile.

We have some people reporting the same issue, so I want to tag a Google Moderator on your post for a deeper check

2 Likes

Hi @vaarre

Thanks for reaching out and sharing these examples, so that we can better understand your inquiry. Please be aware that workarounds are not allowed and this may cause your removal from the program. Please make sure you follow the rules when contributing on Google Maps and keep in mind that the map layers on the map are not supposed to be updated or changed.

3 Likes

Hi again @KatyaL ,

Please be assured that these shares were done in good faith, and with no intended workarounds. The fact that I explicitly shared these examples with you should be a strong indicator. It is sometimes frustratingly hard to distinguish between map locations and a POI’s in the list of suggested upload candidates. All software has bugs or deficits, and all humans make errors. It’s a question of what’s the acceptable level of error rates, I guess. I am thinking that Google easily could prevent e.g. the upload of duplicates, if you wanted to, but that the engineering and compute costs of that feature would not match the value it would give you. I.e. a regular cost-benefit decision.

1 Like

Hi @vaarre ,

Thank you so much for your comment! We welcome your valuable feedback! I would like to remind you that if you have any ideas for improvements, you’re welcome to suggest them in Idea Exchange.

3 Likes